检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闵之藤 石梦蝶[2] 殷文军 梁娇君 陈振龙 易桂林 MIN Zhi-teng;SHI Meng-die;YIN Wen-jun;LIANG Jiao-jun;CHEN Zhen-long;YI Gui-lin(Wuhan Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases,Wuhan,Hubei 430015,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]武汉市职业病防治院职业卫生科,湖北武汉430015 [2]武汉市疾病预防控制中心环境健康与食品安全所
出 处:《现代预防医学》2023年第1期76-79,96,共5页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:武汉科技大学职业危害识别与控制湖北省重点实验室项目(OHIC2018Y04);武汉科技大学职业危害识别与控制湖北省重点实验室项目(OHIC2021Y12)。
摘 要:目的 对复杂电磁环境(complex electromagnetic environment, CEE)工作人员的DNA和RNA氧化损伤情况以及其影响因素进行分析,为预防和控制职业病危害提供科学依据。方法 采用方便抽样法选择武汉某芯片厂CEE工作人员(n=133)为暴露组和办公室人员(n=56)为对照组,用稀释法和液相色谱-三重四级杆质谱仪测量氧化应激标志物8-羟基脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)和8-羟基鸟苷(8-OHG)在其尿液样本中的浓度。根据问卷调查结果,用logistic回归法分析影响8-OHdG的相关因素。结果 暴露组人员尿中的8-OHdG和8-OHG,经尿比重调整后浓度中位数分别为9.34 ng/ml和17.08 ng/ml。与对照组相比,暴露组8-OHdG浓度高于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.194,P=0.028)。CEE(OR=3.07,95%CI:1.35~7.00)、吸烟(OR=2.62,95%CI:1.13~6.08)和运动(OR=2.5,95%CI:1.04~6.00)为危险因素;女性(OR=0.09,95%CI:0.03~0.28)为保护因素。结论 长期暴露于复杂电磁环境(CEE)可引起氧化应激损伤,应加强此类职业人群的劳动保护。Objective To provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of occupational hazard by studying the oxidative damage of DNA/RNA in complex electromagnetic environment(CEE) workers and its influencing factors. Methods The concentrations of oxidative stress markers 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine(8-OHdG) and 8-hydroxyguanosine(8-OHG) in urine samples were analyzed by dilution method and liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry(LC-MS). CEE workers(n =133) in a chip factory in Wuhan were selected as the exposure group and office workers(n=56) as the control group. According to the survey results, the influencing factors of 8-OHdG were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results The median concentrations of 8-OHdG and 8-OHG in urine of the exposed group were 9.34 ng/ml and 17.08 ng/ml respectively. Compared with the control group, the concentration of 8-OHdG in exposed group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(Z=-2.194, P=0.028). CEE(OR=3.07, 95%CI: 1.35-7.00), smoking(OR=2.62, 95%CI: 1.13-6.08) and exercise(OR=2.5, 95%CI: 1.04-6.00) were risk factors. Female(OR=0.09, 95%CI: 0.03-0.28) was a protective factor. Conclusion Long-term exposure to CEE can cause oxidative stress injury, so labor protection should be strengthened for this kind of occupational population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117