担保合同仲裁管辖的制度完善  

System Improvement of Arbitration Jurisdiction of Guarantee Contracts

作　　者：丁国民[1] 吴光慧 张程[1] DING Guomin;WU Guanghui;ZHANG Cheng(Law School of Fuzhou University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350016,China)

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350016

出　　处：《财经理论与实践》2023年第1期155-160,共6页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BFX073)。

摘　　要：《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民法典〉有关担保制度的解释》第二十一条的规定弥补了相关法律对担保合同仲裁管辖的缺漏,但该司法解释未能将担保合同纠纷是否可以提交仲裁进行类型化规定,因而针对担保合同仲裁管辖权异议的问题也就随之产生,司法裁判也莫衷一是。对此,需要在对担保合同仲裁管辖进行类型化分析的基础上,从担保合同仲裁管辖异议审查所应遵循的基本原则出发,完善相关立法,从而为人民法院和仲裁机构正确处理担保合同仲裁管辖权异议问题提供指导。The Supreme People’s Court has promulgated the Judicial Interpretation for Related Guarantee System in Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, and Article 21 of the Interpretation makes up for the lack of jurisdiction over the arbitration of guarantee contracts in relevant laws. However, the Article fails to categorize whether disputes over guarantee contracts can be submitted to arbitration or not. Then, there are objections to the jurisdiction of the guarantee contract arbitration, as well as discrepancies in judicial adjudication. Therefore, relevant legislation is necessary to be improved, which based on the topological analysis of the arbitration jurisdiction of guarantee contracts on the basic principle of review of jurisdiction objection of guarantee contract arbitration. Thus, the people’s courts and arbitration institutions can be guided to correctly handle the objections to the jurisdiction of the arbitration of the guarantee contract.

关 键 词：担保合同 仲裁管辖 类型化分析 制度完善 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]