检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘湘[1] 党明[2] 陈艳娟 王新玲[1] 周亚娟 LIU Xiang;DANG Ming;CHEN Yanjuan;WANG Xinling;ZHOU Yajuan(Respiratory Intensive Care Unit,Jiaozuo People's Hospital,Jiaozuo 454002,China;3^(rd) Ward of Neurology Department,Jiaozuo People's Hospital,Jiaozuo 454002,China)
机构地区:[1]焦作市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河南焦作454002 [2]焦作市人民医院神经内科三区,河南焦作454002
出 处:《临床医学工程》2023年第1期93-94,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基 金:河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(2018320928)。
摘 要:目的探讨风险护理模式对慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者的应用效果。方法将400例AECOPD患者随机分为两组,对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上给予风险护理模式。比较两组患者的病情恢复情况、风险事件及护理满意度。结果观察组的呼吸机使用时间、ICU滞留时间、总住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组风险事件发生率为7.5%,低于对照组的15.5%(P<0.05)。观察组护理满意度为92.0%,高于对照组的83.5%(P<0.05)。结论风险护理模式可促进AECOPD患者病情康复,降低风险事件发生率,提高患者的护理满意度。Objective To explore the application effect of risk nursing mode on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods 400 AECOPD patients were randomly divided into two groups.The control group was given routine nursing intervention,and the observation group was given risk nursing mode intervention on the basis of the control group.The disease recovery,risk events and nursing satisfaction degree of the two groups were compared.Results The ventilator use time,ICU stay time and total hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of risk events in the observation group was 7.5%,lower than 15.5%in the control group(P<0.05).The nursing satisfaction degree of the observation group was 92.0%,higher than 83.5%of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions Risk nursing mode can promote the rehabilitation of AECOPD patients,reduce the incidence of risk events,and improve the nursing satisfaction degree.
关 键 词:风险护理模式 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期 风险事件 护理满意度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175