检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵世琦 Zhao Shiqi(School of Criminal Justice,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
机构地区:[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450000
出 处:《洛阳师范学院学报》2022年第11期86-91,共6页Journal of Luoyang Normal University
摘 要:强人工智能体可以具备辨认和控制能力,其基于独立意志在编程范围外实施严重危害社会的行为理应受到刑法规制.我国现行刑法体系中责任主体仅包括自然人与法人,刑事责任承担方式也不能完全适用于强人工智能体,无法应对强人工智能时代的刑事风险.为此,应通过赋予强人工智能体刑事责任主体地位,对犯罪的强人工智能体设置财产刑、限制行为自由、修改程序的刑事责任承担方式.Agents of strong artificial intelligence should be regulated by criminal law for their behaviors that seriously endanger society outside the scope of programming based on their independent wills.However,the subjects of responsibility in current criminal law system in China only comprise natural persons and legal persons,and ways to bear criminal responsibility can’t fully apply to these agents,so the current criminal law can’t cope with criminal risks in the era of strong artificial intelligence.Suggestions are proposed that agents of strong artificial intelligence should be endowed with the status of subjects of criminal responsibility,and that ways to bear criminal responsibility should be set such as property punishment,restrictive freedom of behavior,and program modification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.67