检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢张睿 陈星[1] Xing Zhangrui;Chen Xing
出 处:《新世纪图书馆》2022年第12期77-84,共8页New Century Library
基 金:2022年广西研究生教育创新计划项目“高校图书馆数字化建设中的版权清算研究——以第三次修订著作权法实施为视角”(项目编号:YCSW2022253)系列研究成果之一。
摘 要:电子书的发展在公共借阅权引起了广泛而深刻的讨论,数字公共借阅权回应了数字时代的号召,将电子书拓展至公共借阅权的客体范畴。2016年欧洲法院裁决的VOB v.Stichting Leenrecht一案对公共借阅权的数字化拓展作出了肯定答复,但是备受欧盟法律影响的挪威在2018年对本国的版权法和图书馆补偿法修订后,并没有将其拓展至数字公共借阅权,原因在于修法后的《挪威版权法》在发行权穷竭问题上仍然与数字公共借阅权存在冲突,修法后的《挪威图书馆补偿法》也没有例外规定。与此同时,我国《公共图书馆法》于2018年1月1日正式实施,同时《著作权法》经历第三次修订后于2021年6月1日正式实施,通过VOB案为视角对比《挪威版权法》和《挪威图书馆补偿法》尚未拓展至数字公共借阅权的原因,以期为我国构建数字公共借阅权提供启示。The development of e-books has aroused extensive and profound discussions in the field of public lending right.Digital public lending right have responded to the call of the digital age and extended e-books to the object category of public lending right.The VOB v.Stichting Leenrecht case ruled by the European Court of Justice in 2016 gave a positive answer to the digital expansion of public lending right.However,Norway,which has been affected by EU law,revised its copyright law and library compensation law in 2018,and It has not been extended to the digital public lending right.It can be seen that the legal dilemma formed by the conflicting interests of all parties behind the amendment will be the biggest obstacle to the implementation of the digital public lending right.China’s Public Library Law was officially launched on January 1,2018.At the same time,the Copyright Law was officially implemented on June 1,2021 after the third revision.By comparing the reasons why the Norwegian Copyright Law and the Library Compensation Law have not been extended to the digital public lending right,in order to provide inspiration for the construction of digital public lending rights in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.109.137