检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范超文 龚志军 Fan Chao-wen;Gong Zhi-jun(Department of Law,Hunan University of Technology and Business,Changsha Hunan 410000)
出 处:《长治学院学报》2022年第6期38-43,共6页Journal of Changzhi University
摘 要:在死刑案件中适用刑事和解制度是刑事法律量刑依据的具体体现,与我国宽严相济的政策及认罪认罚从宽原则相适应,是国家补偿制度缺位的重要补充。死刑案件能否适用刑事和解制度在学界中尚存争议,被告人是否真心悔罪并取得被害方的谅解,所侵犯的法益是否具有可调解性、可逆性,以及因其犯罪行为所带来的社会效果都是影响死刑案件中适用刑事和解的重要因素。随着人权主义的不断发展,废除死刑已是大势所趋,以司法机关作为中间人,被告人与被害方占主导地位的架构来构建死刑案件刑事和解制度有利于减少死刑的适用,有助于推动我国人权事业进一步发展。The application of criminal reconciliation in death penalty cases is a concrete embodiment of the basis of sentencing in criminal law.It is compatible with China's policy of tempering justice with mercy and the principle of leniency in confession and punishment.It is an important supplement to the absence of the national compensation system.Whether criminal reconciliation is applicable to death penalty cases is still controversial in the academic circles.Whether the defendant sincerely repents and obtains the understanding of the victim,whether the legal interests infringed are reconcilable and reversible,and the social effects it brings are important factors affecting the application of criminal reconciliation in death penalty cases.With the continuous development of human rights,the abolition of the death penalty has become a general trend.The construction of the criminal reconciliation system in death penalty cases with the judiciary as the intermediary and the dominant structure of the defendant and the victim is conducive to reducing the application of the death penalty and promoting the further development of China's human rights cause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.200.134