“阐释的边界”与阐释的文本之维  

“The Boundary of Interpretation” and the Textual Dimension of Interpretation

作　　者：庞弘[1] PANG Hong(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,610068)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学文学院

出　　处：《云南社会科学》2023年第1期144-152,共9页Social Sciences in Yunnan

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘阐释的边界’与当代文学理论的话语重估研究”(项目号:18CZW006)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在文学理论中,“阐释的边界”是一个不容忽视的命题。20世纪以来,文本的重要性不断提升,成为了阐释边界建构中具有奠基性的维度。作为语言文字的造物,文本为阐释提供了真切可感的目标和路径,有助于跨越相对主义的藩篱,对意义的客观性、完整性和确定性加以重建。在理论中心的背景下,对文本的诉求将促使人文学者摆脱观念先行的虚妄状态,获得来自文本经验的佐证与支撑。当然,对文本的执着蕴含着阐释的独断论倾向,而文本的中性特征又很容易造成不同阐释话语的冲突。因此,如何以文本为契机,使文学阐释中的诸要素形成良性对话与动态平衡,将会是一个需要深入思考的问题。In literary theory, “the boundary of interpretation” is a theoretical proposition that cannot be overlooked. Since the 20th century, the text is growing in importance and has become a foundational dimension of constructing the boundary of interpretation. As the creation of language, the text provides tangible goals and paths for interpretation, which helps to overcome the limitations of relativism and reconstruct the objectivity,completeness and determinacy of meaning. In the context of “theory centrism”, the discussion of text helps humanists get rid of the state of concept first and obtain the evidences and supports from textual experience.Without a doubt, the insistence on text implies the tendency of dogmatism, and the neutral characteristics of text can easily lead to the divergence of different interpretive discourses. Therefore, how to take text as an occasion to form benign dialogues and dynamic balances among various elements of literary interpretation, will be a question that needs in-depth consideration.

关 键 词：阐释的边界 文本 意义 确定性 文本中心论 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]