检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵建波 李世芸[1] 熊鹰 黄子毅 Zhao Jianbo;Li Shiyun;Xiong Ying;Huang Ziyi(Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;Department of Orthopedics,Kunming Yan'an Hospital,Kunming 650510,Yunnan,China;Yunnan Opus Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.,Kunming 650510,Yunnan,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学,云南省昆明市650500 [2]昆明市延安医院骨科,云南省昆明市650510 [3]云南欧铂斯医疗科技有限公司,云南省昆明市650510
出 处:《农业装备与车辆工程》2023年第1期113-116,共4页Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering
摘 要:对比新型与传统接骨板(Locking Compression Plate,LCP)固定股骨远端骨折的生物力学情况,为选择接骨板提供理论依据。应用有限元分析选择步态运动时的载荷作为约束条件,分析接骨板的变形、应力及骨痂的变形情况,发现在步态情况下,传统接骨板的最大应力是新型的1.8倍,最大变形是新型的2.9倍。使用新型接骨板固定股骨远端骨折失效性远小于传统LCP,拥有更好的生物力学性能。Objective To compare the biomechanics of locking compression plate(LCP) for distal femoral fracture and provide theoretical basis for the selection of locking compression plate. Methods Finite element analysis was used to analyze the deformation, stress and callus deformation of the bone plate. Results Under the condition of gait, the maximum stress and deformation of the traditional plate were 1.8 times and 2.9 times higher than that of the new one. Conclusion The failure rate of the new plate is much lower than that of the traditional LCP, and it has better biomechanical properties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49