检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王威 WANG Wei(Law School&Intellectual Property School,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510800)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学法学院/知识产权学院,广州510800
出 处:《中国发明与专利》2023年第1期73-80,共8页China Invention & Patent
摘 要:随着标准必要专利的研究日益深入,相关主题研究文献数量庞大,笔者在对国内标准必要专利的研究文献进行检索分析后,梳理出国内标准必要专利的研究呈现出的两个特点:(1)标准必要专利的研究与专利许可合同的研究相分离;(2)竞争法是研究与规制标准必要专利的主要路径。对比国外研究文献,国外更多学者关注标准必要专利许可合同本身的研究,标准必要专利许可合同的灵活性得到更多学者的强调。笔者认为,对于标准必要专利的研究以及现实问题的解决应该回归到标准必要专利许可合同的道路上,将标准必要专利与专利许可合同结合起来,以平衡标准必要专利许可合同当事人双方的权利义务为标准,研究标准必要专利许可合同。As the research on standard-essential patents becomes more and more in-depth,there is a huge amount of research achievements on related topics.After searching and analyzing the research materials on standard-essential patents in China,the author finds there are two characteristics of the research on standard-essential patents in China:(1)the research on standard-essential patents and patent licensing contracts is separated from each other,and(2)the Competition Law is not only the research foundation of standard-essential patents but also the major measure to regulate the standard-essential patents.In comparison with the research abroad,more scholars focus on the license contract for standard-essential patents itself,and particularly emphasize on the flexibility of license contract for standard-essential patents.The author believes that the study on standard-essential patents and the solution to real problems should focus on the license contract for standard-essential patent,ultimately,by combining the standard-essential patents with patent license contract to study standard-essential patents to achieve a balance between the rights and obligations of the parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222