知识产权惩罚性赔偿基数与倍数计算规则  

Calculation Rules of the Base and Multiple of Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property

作　　者：汤玉姣 葛章志[1] 段玉珍[1,2] Tang Yujiao;Ge Zhangzhi;Duan Yuzhen(Intellectual Property Research Institute,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China;College of Economic and Management,Anhui Open University,Hefei 230022,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术大学知识产权研究院,安徽合肥230026 [2]安徽开放大学经济与管理学院,安徽合肥230022

出　　处：《科技与法律（中英文）》2022年第6期135-148,共14页Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）

摘　　要：知识产权惩罚性赔偿是对侵犯知识产权行为处以超额赔偿,以实现惩罚等功能的民事赔偿制度。我国知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度规则体系已基本建立,但司法适用依旧问题多多。一是赔偿基数难以计算,法定赔偿适用比例过高。应当摒弃因基数无法精确计算直接适用法定赔偿理念,适用多因素估算规则确定赔偿基数。二是赔偿倍数确定因素杂乱,缺乏层次和标准。倍数确定要件实为主客观要件二次考量,应分类分级逐步确定。主客观要件一体两面,可在主观方面引入恶意概念以确定基础区间,再依据客观情节严重程度细化倍数区间。Punitive damages for intellectual property is a civil compensation system that imposes excessive compensation for the infringement of intellectual property to achieve such functions as punishment. The method of punitive damages for intellectual property in China has been basically established, but there are still many problems with judicial application. Firstly, it is difficult to calculate the base of damages, and the applicable proportion of legal compensation is too high. To determine the bottom of injuries, we should abandon the idea of directly applying for statutory compensation due to inaccurate base calculation or adopting the multi-factor estimation rules.Secondly, the factors for determining the multiple of compensation are messy and lack levels and standards. The multiple determination element is actually a secondary consideration of subjective and objective elements and needs to be determined gradually by classification and grading. Subjective and objective elements should be integrated: Introduces the concept of malice in the subjective aspect to determine the basic interval and then refine the interval of the multiple according to the objective circumstances.

关 键 词：知识产权 惩罚性赔偿 赔偿基数和倍数 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]