性自我防卫能力评定的法律契合  

The Legal Correspondence of Sexual Self-Defense Capability Assessment

作　　者：樊慧雨 李豪喆 张钦廷 FAN Hui-yu;LI Hao-zhe;ZHANG Qing-ting(Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine,Key Laboratory of Forensic Science,Ministry of Justice,Shanghai Forensic Service Platform,Academy of Forensic Science,Shanghai 200063,China)

机构地区：[1]司法鉴定科学研究院、上海市法医学重点实验室、司法部司法鉴定重点实验室、上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台,上海200063

出　　处：《法医学杂志》2022年第5期606-610,共5页Journal of Forensic Medicine

基　　金：上海市“科技创新行动计划”社会发展科技攻关资助项目(20DZ1200300);上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目(21DZ2270800);司法部司法鉴定重点实验室资助项目;上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目。

摘　　要：目的了解性自我防卫能力鉴定意见的法律适用及案件处置情况,探析性自我防卫能力评定法律契合的必要性。方法根据自制调查表,通过电话回访调查及查阅案例裁判信息,统计司法鉴定科学研究院于2012年1月1日—2018年12月31日鉴定完成的性自我防卫能力评定案件的处理情况。结果69例案例中,完全性自我防卫能力3例(4.3%),性防卫能力削弱30例(43.5%),无性自我防卫能力32例(46.2%),不宜评定4例(5.8%)。30例被评定为性自我防卫能力削弱者中,15例被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查,15例未被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查,处理不一致比例为1∶1;被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查的案件中,10例由检察院批捕起诉,被法院判处有期徒刑,其余5例未被检察院批捕起诉,处理不一致比例达2∶1。结论性自我防卫能力削弱鉴定意见法律适用不一致,司法处置混乱,性自我防卫能力等级划分与法律要求进行统一、契合势在必行。Objective To understand the legal application and case deposition of assessment opinions of sexual self-defense capability,and to explore the necessity of legal correspondence in the sexual defense capability assessment.Methods According to the self-made questionnaire,the cases of sexual self-defense capability assessment completed by the Academy of Forensic Science from January 1,2012 to December 31,2018 were statistically analyzed through telephone interviews and referrals.Re⁃sults Among the 69 cases,3 cases(4.3%)had complete sexual self-defense capability,30 cases(43.5%)had weakened sexual self-defense capability,32 cases(46.2%)had no sexual self-defense capability,and 4 cases(5.8%)were not suitable for assessment.Among the 30 cases with weakened sexual self-defense ability,15 cases were filed and investigated by public security authorities for rape and 15 cases were not.The inconsistent rate of disposition was 1∶1.Among the 15 rape cases filed and investigated by the public security authorities,10 cases were arrested and prosecuted by the procuratorate and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment by the court,while the other 5 cases were not arrested and prosecuted by the procuratorate,with an inconsistent rate of disposition being 2∶1.Conclu⁃sion The legal application of the assessment opinion on the weakening of sexual self-defense capability is inconsistent,and the judicial disposition is confusing.It is imperative to unify and correspond the classification of sexual self-defense capability with the legal requirements.

关 键 词：法医精神病学 司法鉴定 精神障碍 性自我防卫能力 等级划分 法律 契合 

分 类 号：DF795.1[医药卫生—法医学]