检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛明策[1] 吴素良[1] 雷杨娜[1] Mao Mingce;Wu Suliang;Lei YangNa(Shaanxi Climate Center,Xi,an 710014,Shaanxi)
出 处:《陕西水利》2023年第1期62-65,共4页Shaanxi Water Resources
基 金:陕西省2021年重点研发计划(2021SF-477)。
摘 要:为了适应城市暴雨强度增强的事实,修编了陕西部分城市的暴雨强度公式。比较新公式与1980年代公式发现:早期公式与当前实况误差大于规范要求的限值,表明观测资料长度对暴雨强度公式与实况强度之间的误差有很大影响;早期公式暴雨强度低于当前值,因此当前仍使用早期暴雨强度公式会降低设计和建设标准,这也是造成城市积水和洪涝灾害的重要原因。西安4个年代暴雨强度公式的误差表明,随着暴雨强度变化更新城市暴雨强度公式是较为合理的选择。The rainfall intensity formula for several cities in Shaanxi province was revised in order to adapt the fact of increasing urban rainfall. The result shows, comparing the new formula to the formula made about 1980’s, the error between early formula and reality is beyond the national standard, that means the length of rain data is deeply influenced the error between the formula and reality. The rainfall intensity predicted by the earlier formula is lower than the real intensity, so the earlier formula reduces the design and construction standard, which was the main reasons for the urban waterlogging and flood disaster. The error of four formulas in different era suggests it is reasonable selection that the revision of urban rainfall intensity formula along with the change of storm intensity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.194.164