检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:纪倩[1]
机构地区:[1]广东农工商职业技术学院管理学院,广州510000
出 处:《智慧农业导刊》2023年第2期68-71,共4页JOURNAL OF SMART AGRICULTURE
基 金:广东高校科研平台青年创新人才项目(2019GWQNCX050);广东云浮市哲学社会科学规划研究课题(2022云社研[38]号);广东农工商职业技术学院优秀青年学者项目(XJXZ1903)。
摘 要:作为缓解农村农用地问题和促进农村可持续发展的政策工具,农用地整治引起社会各界的关注。为完善我国农用地整治,采取案例分析方法,综合比较欧洲和中国农用地整治的政策,发现存在的问题和改进的措施。结果表明,欧洲和中国农用地整治在立法、程序与农民参与意愿方面存在差异,特别是,中国农民参与农用地整治的积极性不足,难以成为农用地整治的推动力,在此基础上,有针对性地提出完善中国农用地整治的建议。As a policy tool to alleviate the problem of rural agricultural land and promote rural sustainable development,agricultural land renovation has attracted the attention of all sectors of the community. In order to improve the agricultural land renovation in China, this paper adopts the method of case analysis, comprehensively compares the policies of agricultural land renovation in Europe and China, and finds out the existing problems and improvement measures. The results show that there are differences in legislation, procedures and farmers’ willingness to participate in agricultural land renovation between Europe and China;in particular, the enthusiasm of Chinese farmers to participate in agricultural land renovation is insufficient, so it is difficult to become the driving force of agricultural land renovation;on this basis, targeted suggestions are put forward to improve the regulation of agricultural land in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222