我国油气管道突发事件应急法律制度的困境与完善路径  

On the Dilemma and Path of China’s Oil and Gas Pipeline Emergency Legal System

作　　者：孙增芹[1] 顾伶俐 SUN Zengqin;GU Lingli(School of Humanities and Law,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao 266580,Shandong China;East China Branch of Guangdong Water Investment Co.Ltd,Nanjing 210000,Jiangsu China)

机构地区：[1]中国石油大学(华东)文法学院,山东青岛266580 [2]广东粤海水务投资有限公司华东分公司,江苏南京210000

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期79-87,共9页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部首批新文科研究与改革实践项目(2021140087)。

摘　　要：当前,我国的油气管道事故频发,事故发生前的预防和事故发生后的应急处置是降低管道事故损失的重要手段。通过系统梳理我国油气管道突发事件应急法律体系和制度内容发现,目前存在应急预案制度不完善、信息协同制度不完备以及应急监管制度不明晰等制度困境,困境成因在于现行法律体系不完备以及管理体制存在弊端。对此,在考察借鉴美国和加拿大油气管道突发事件应急法律体系和法律制度的基础上,提出如下建议:增加高位阶油气管道应急法律法规与健全低位阶油气管道应急规定,以完善油气管道应急法律体系;从改善我国油气管道应急预案制度、规范突发事件信息报告与共享制度、建立综合权威的应急监管制度等方面优化油气管道应急主要法律制度的内容。As has been predicted, China’s oil and gas pipelines have entered a period of high incidence of accidents, which entail both the prior preventive safeguards and subsequent emergency disposals to minimize the losses. Analysis has suggested that the root cause lies in the loopholes of the current oil and gas pipeline emergency legal system and management regime, which include the inadequate contingency planning, insufficient information coordination, and intransparent emergency monitoring system. Accordingly, referring to the situation of the United States and Canada, we propose improving the oil and gas pipeline contingency management regime by designing upper-rank legislation and amending lower-rank regulations. Practices regarding specific paths include improving China’s oil and gas pipeline contingency management regime, standardizing the emergency information reporting and sharing management system, and establishing a comprehensive and authoritative emergency supervision mechanism.

关 键 词：油气管道 突发事件 应急预案 应急制度 

分 类 号：D922.67[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]