检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:臧爽[1] 崔赢[2] 倪翠萍 穆佳欣 张露 宋冰[1] 刘宇 ZANG Shuang;CUI Ying;NI Cuiping;MU Jiaxin;ZHANG Lu;SONG Bing;LIU Yu
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学护理学院,沈阳市110000 [2]中国医科大学附属盛京医院神经内科
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2023年第1期46-54,共9页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:中国医科大学护理科研重点项目(2021HL-01)。
摘 要:目的 全面、系统地收集国内外用于评估卒中后疲劳的工具,总结并分析其开发过程、特点及应用情况,为临床医护人员选择筛查卒中后疲劳的适宜评估工具提供参考。方法 系统检索7个中英文数据库,检索时限为建库至2022年3月13日。提取卒中后疲劳评估工具相关内容进行系统分析,并采用范围综述的方法对检索结果进行规范化报告。结果纳入48篇符合标准的文献,36篇关于评估工具的开发与验证,12篇关于评估工具的本土化及应用,共涉及20个卒中后疲劳评估工具。结论 建议使用多维度疲劳评估工具评估卒中后疲劳,未来应进一步验证现有卒中后疲劳评估工具的信效度,完善评估工具,并继续引入或研制本土化、全面、有效的卒中后疲劳特异性评估工具。Objective To collect assessment tools for post-stroke fatigue at home and abroad,to summarize and analyze their development process,characteristics and applications,so as to provide references for clinical medical staff to select the suitable assessment tools for post-stroke fatigue screening. Methods Focusing on assessment tools for post-stroke fatigue,we systematically searched 7 Chinese and English databases from the inception to March 13,2022. Relevant information was extracted for systematic analysis,and results were standardizedly reported using a scope review method. Results 48 studies were involved in the final review,including 36 studies on the development and validation of assessment tools,and 12 studies on the localization and application of assessment tools,involving 20 post-stroke fatigue assessment tools. Conclusion It is recommended to use the multi-dimensional fatigue assessment tools for post-stroke fatigue. In the future,the reliability and validity of existing post-stroke fatigue assessment tools still need to be further verified and improved,and comprehensive and effective post-stroke fatigue specific assessment tools should be continuously introduced or developed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.64.3