机构地区:[1]华东师范大学工商管理学院,上海200062 [2]北京大学城市与环境学院旅游研究与规划中心,北京100871
出 处:《旅游学刊》2023年第1期134-151,共18页Tourism Tribune
摘 要:随着旅游学术研究日益繁荣,旅游学术共同体不断壮大。文章以中国知网的北大中文核心期刊数据库、CSSCI数据库和CSCD数据库作为数据检索源,通过25个旅游相关字段检索了1979—2021年我国学者发表的旅游类文章40 245篇,采用文献计量统计、社会网络分析、知识图谱等多种方法,从合著网络、学缘关系、学术流派3个维度全面认识和评估我国旅游学术共同体发展概况和特征。研究结果表明:(1)目前,我国旅游学术研究的核心学者群多达649位成员,马耀峰、陆林、孙根年等学者的科研成果数量多,保继刚、吴必虎、马耀峰、黄震方等学者的学术影响力大;学者之间的交流与合作进一步推动了旅游学术研究的发展,形成核心领导型、领域驱动型、培养带动型、学科交叉型等4种网络发展模式。(2)南京大学、华东师范大学、中山大学、北京大学等是我国旅游学术人才培育的主力单位,师范院校和综合性大学分别是旅游学术人才输出或输入的重要阵地;旅游学术领域目前存在同源驱动型、定向流动型、地缘临近型等3种学缘关系,对旅游学术机构的成果产出有重要影响。(3)在理论范式指导下,旅游学术领域主要有三大传统流派,分别是以陈传康、保继刚、吴必虎等为代表的旅游资源流派,以谢彦君、樊友猛、龙江智等为代表的旅游体验流派,以张广瑞、张凌云、邹统钎等为代表的旅游产业流派。该研究为我国旅游学术共同体评估提供了新的切入点和分析框架,并对旅游学科及其他社会科学领域的科研团队建设、学术人才培养、学科理论建构具有一定的指导意义。With growth in the volume of tourism academic research, the Chinese tourism academic community has expanded since 1979. Tourism scholars and research groups, tourism colleges and research institutions, and high-quality tourism academic articles and journals together constitute China’s tourism academic community;they have become the basis and guarantee for the sustainable development of tourism research there. Besides evaluating those key performance indicators in the research articles by the scholars and institutions, the tourism academic community should share their consensus and context of tourism studies by core scholars’ collaboration network, academic-origins,and research areas/theoretical paradigms/mainstreams.This study employed CNKI databases for three core Chinese periodicals indexes(PKU Core Journal of China, CSSCI and CSCD) as information sources. Altogether 41 284 articles were identified being related to tourism published by Chinese researchers from 1979 to 2021. After checking and deleting duplicates and various filtering, 40 245 articles were confirmed as the research sample.Literature metrology analysis, social network analysis, and mapping knowledge analysis methods were applied to conduct a systematic analysis for tourism academic collaboration networks, tourism academicorigins’ relationships, and tourism academic mainstreams in China. Those three dimensions for academic institutions allow a comprehensive understanding and evaluation of the development situation and characteristics of China’s tourism academic community.First, co-occurrence analysis of the co-authors of 40 245 articles showed a relatively close cooperation structure of China’s tourism academic network. Altogether 649 core authors who had at least 13 publications in the above database, were identified by the Price Law. Such scholars as Ma Yaofeng, Lu Lin, and Sun Gennian made a considerable number of research achievements. The core authors promoted the development of tourism academic networks through research collaborati
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...