我国期货市场行业仲裁机制的构建路径浅析——以伦敦金属交易所仲裁机制为例  

Analysis on the Construction Path of Chinese Futures Market Industry Arbitration Mechanism: Taking the London Metal Exchange Arbitration Mechanism as an Example

作　　者：吴韬 WU Tao

机构地区：[1]上海期货与衍生品研究院 [2]上海期货交易所 [3]华东政法大学

出　　处：《中国证券期货》2022年第3期42-49,共8页Securities & Futures of China

摘　　要：习近平总书记在2019年中央政法工作会议上提出,“把非诉讼纠纷解决机制挺在前面”,为建设多元纠纷化解体系指明了方向。我国期货市场行业仲裁仍处于起步阶段,《期货和衍生品法》对构建系统性的多元纠纷解决机制予以初步探索。比较而言,境外期货交易场所一般都设置有解决自身平台上市合约纠纷解决机制,体现纠纷化解的专业性、灵活性和低成本,为客户提供“一站式”服务,一定程度上增强了客户的黏性和忠诚度,从而促进了影响力的提升。正如伦敦金属交易所(LME)的内置仲裁模式,即内置仲裁组织来化解LME合约纠纷或是其他与金属交易有关的现货市场的纠纷。本文拟从比较分析上述模式入手,提出我国期货市场建立高效便利的多元纠纷解决机制的建议。General Secretary Xi Jinping proposed at the 2019 Central Political and Legal Work Conference that “put the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism in the front”,pointing out the direction for building a multi-disciplinary dispute resolution system.my country’s futures market industry arbitration is still in its infancy, and the “Futures and Derivatives Law” is a preliminary exploration of building a systematic and diverse dispute resolution mechanism.Comparatively speaking, overseas futures trading venues generally have a dispute resolution mechanism for resolving contracts listed on their own platforms, which reflects the professionalism, flexibility and low cost of dispute resolution, and provides customers with “one-stop”services, which to a certain extent enhances the of stickiness and loyalty, thus promoting the increase of influence.Just like the built-in arbitration model of the London Metal Exchange(LME),that is, a built-in arbitration organization to resolve LME contract disputes or other spot market disputes related to metal trading.This paper intends to start with a comparative analysis of the above models, in order to provide suggestions for the establishment of an efficient and convenient multi-dispute resolution mechanism in my country’s futures market.

关 键 词：期货市场多元纠纷解决机制 内置仲裁模式 行业仲裁 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]