检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋颖 Jiang Ying
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院中国社会科学评价研究院,北京100732
出 处:《中国社会科学评价》2022年第4期133-144,158,共13页China Social Science Review
摘 要:近年来,伴随对破除“唯论文”不良倾向、完善代表作制度等的讨论,学术图书评价的重要性日益上升,但目前我国尚未建立起系统、完整、可广泛服务于学术界的中文学术图书评价机制和体系。制约学术图书评价体系发展的瓶颈问题是尚未形成出版前同行评审制度、评价数据有效性低及评价研究不足。从学术图书生命周期视角出发,建立中文学术图书全过程评价模型,可以突破以上瓶颈。其中的关键是打破部门信息限制,推动评价信息流动,实现信息共享,从而推进以同行评审为基础、定量评价为辅助的科学合理的学术图书综合性评价体系建设。In recent years,with the discussions about getting rid of the unfortunate tendency of regarding the “thesis only” and perfecting the representative work system,the importance of the evaluation of academic work is increasing.However,at present,a systematic and complete evaluation mechanism and system for Chinese academic works which could be of wide service to academic circles has yet to be established.The bottleneck problems restricting the development of the academic works evaluation system include the fact that there is as yet no pre-publication peer review system;the validity of the evaluation data is low;and research on evaluation is insufficient.From the perspective of the life cycle of academic works,a whole process evaluation model for Chinese academic works can break through the above bottlenecks.The key is to break down departmental information restrictions,promote the flow of information on evaluation,and achieve information sharing,so as to promote the construction of a scientific and rational comprehensive evaluation system of academic works based on peer review and assisted by quantitative evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38