动产流动质押监管的法律探析——兼评《民法典》担保解释第55条  

Legal Analysis of Movable Property Pledge Supervision——Comments on Article 55 of the Guarantee Interpretation of the Civil Code

作　　者：王富才 WANG Fu-cai(Beijing Dentons Law Offices,LLP(Qingdao),Qingdao 266061,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大成(青岛)律师事务所,山东青岛266061

出　　处：《青岛农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期66-73,共8页Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University(Social Science)

摘　　要：动产流动质押监管是近年来我国银企创新融资的一种新兴产物,虽然我国《民法典》担保解释第55条承继了《九民会议纪要》第63条的内容规定,但未见改良,司法实践中对动产流动质押监管的相关法律问题也是裁判不一。通过对动产流动质押监管不同模式下质权设立效力、质押监管合同的法律性质与监管人归责原则、监管人的责任性质与争议解决的裁判路径等问题分别予以论证并考察我国《民法典》担保解释第55条的规定,提出流动质权设立的评判标准、质押监管合同的混合性质、监管人的过错推定责任和补充赔偿责任以及合并审理等些许见解以期完善法律制度和统一司法裁判。Movable property pledge supervision is a new product of innovative financing between banks and enterprises in China in recent years,Article 55 of guarantee interpretation of Chinese Civil Code inherits Article 63 of Summary of National Conference on Civil and Commercial Trial of Courts(Law[2019]No.254),but there is no improvement.In judicial practice,there exist different views on the related legal issues of movable property pledge supervision.Through the demonstration of the validity of pledge establishment under different modes of movable property pledge supervision,the legal nature of pledge supervision contract and the principle of supervisor’s responsibility,the nature of supervisor’s responsibility and the adjudication path of dispute settlement and the examination of Article 55 of guarantee interpretation of Chinese Civil Code,some views are put forward to improve the legal system and unify judicial judgment,for instance,the judgement standard for the establishment of dynamic pledge right,the mixed nature of the pledge supervision contract,the supervisor’s presumed fault liability,supplementary compensation liability and the combined trial.

关 键 词：流动质押监管 质权设立 混合合同 过错推定 补充责任 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]