检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟晓锋 吴进 蒲斌 汪瑾[2] ZHONG Xiao-feng;WU Jin;PU Bin;WANG Jin(Shanghai PhiChem Material Technology Co.Ltd.,Shanghai 201908,China;Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China)
机构地区:[1]上海飞凯材料科技股份有限公司,上海201908 [2]合肥工业大学,合肥230009
出 处:《现代涂料与涂装》2022年第12期14-17,共4页Modern Paint & Finishing
摘 要:2,4,6-三甲基苯甲酰基-二苯基氧化膦(TPO)是UV-LED光固化涂料中广泛使用的一种光引发剂,但因其生殖毒性问题,寻求其替代品已为工业界广泛关注。本文选用环保型光引发剂2,4,6-三甲基苯甲酰基-二甲苯基氧化膦(TMO),对比其与TPO的光物理和化学性能以及在水性UV上光油涂层中的应用性能。结果表明:TMO的光吸收、光漂白和热稳定性均优于TPO,其溶解性与TPO相同。两者应用于水性UV上光油的固化膜在色差、光泽度方面性能相同,而TMO在各种溶剂中的迁移率远低于TPO,显示出较好的环保安全性。2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl phosphine oxide(TPO) is a widely used photoinitiator in UV-LED photocuring formulations.Due to reproductive toxicity,the search for its replacement has received a lot of attention in recent years.The eco-friendly 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl-dimethylphenyl phosphine oxide(TMO) was evaluated.The photophysical,photochemical properties and application of TMO in waterborne UV varnish were studied and compared with that of TPO.The results showed that the photo absorption,photobleaching and thermal stability of TMO were better than those of TPO,and the solubility of TMO was the same as that of TPO.The properties of TMO and TPO were the same in color difference and glossiness,while the mobility of TMO in various solvents was much lower than that of TPO,which had good environmental security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.224.69