检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷章馨[1] 唐月亮 YIN Zhang-xin;TANG Yue-liang(College of Business,Hunan First Normal University,Changsha 410205,China;Hunan Institute of Economic Geography,Hunan University of Finance and Economics,Changsha 410205,China;College of Resources&Environment,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha 410128,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南第一师范学院商学院,湖南长沙410205 [2]湖南财政经济学院湖南省经济地理研究所,湖南长沙410205 [3]湖南农业大学资源环境学院,湖南长沙4101282
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2023年第2期233-241,共9页Resource Development & Market
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(编号:19YBA091)。
摘 要:促进旅游经济发展与农村民生改善耦合互馈是推进西部地区乡村振兴的重要举措。基于2011—2019年省际面板数据,综合运用修正后熵值法、耦合协调模型和Tobit模型探索西部地区旅游经济发展与农村民生改善的耦合协调时空演化及其影响因素。结果显示:①西部地区旅游经济发展水平和农村民生改善程度均呈现稳步提升态势,但两者均表现出显著的空间非均衡性。②旅游经济发展与农村民生改善的平均耦合协调度处于稳步增长状态,空间上大致呈现“西南高、西北低”的分布特征;研究期末,绝大部分省份已超越勉强协调等级,但亚类别仍以农村民生改善优于旅游经济发展为主。③西部地区经济发展、投资力度、产业结构优化和政策支持对旅游经济发展与农村民生改善的耦合协调具有显著的正向影响,城镇化水平和碳排放强度呈现显著的负向影响,而投资力度的负向影响不显著。Promoting the coupling and mutual feedback between tourism economic development and the improvement of rural livelihood is an important measure to promote rural revitalization in the western region.Based on the inter-provincial panel data from 2011 to 2019,this paper adopted the revised entropy method,the coupling coordination model and the Tobit model to explore the spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of the coupling coordination between the development of tourism economic development and rural livelihood improvement in the Western Area.The results showed that:①The development level of tourism economy in the Western Area and the improvement of rural livelihood both showed a steady increase,but both experienced significant spatial imbalances.②The average coupling coordination degree of tourism economic development and improvement of rural livelihood was in a steady growth trend,and the spatial distribution was roughly‘high in the southwest and low in the northwest’;At the end of the study period,most provinces were already above the barely coordinated level.However,the sub-category was still based on the improvement of rural livelihood over tourism economic development.③Economic development,investment intensity,industrial structure optimization and policy support in the Western Area had a significant positive impact on the coupling coordination of tourism economic development and improvement of rural livelihood,while the level of urbanization presents,and carbon emission intensity a significant negative impact.Additionally,the negative of investment was not apparent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30