庆元“禁书”对朱学影响之检视  

An Examination of the Influence of the Officially Banned Books in the Qingyuan Period on the School of Zhu Xi

作　　者：管仁杰 Guan Renjie

机构地区：[1]河南大学文学院,河南开封475001 [2]河南大学文学院博士后流动站,河南开封475001

出　　处：《史学月刊》2023年第2期64-72,共9页Journal of Historical Science

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“宋代楚辞文献学研究”(2022CWX037)。

摘　　要：庆元党禁时期官方“禁书”的主要目的在于整顿科场文风,被禁书籍基本是以永嘉时文为代表的科举用书以及浸染士子文风的道学支脉语录或文字。在此过程中,虽不免偶涉程朱一派之著述,但更在无意中帮助朱学清除了异己思想势力,朱学是客观上的受益者。《庆元党禁》等史料所载“六经、《语》《孟》《中庸》《大学》之书为世大禁”的说法,不论是泛指儒家经典,还是特指朱熹著述,都不符合事实。目前尚无证据说明朱熹著述在党禁中曾遭毁板,而且党禁期间朱熹依然从事着出版活动。世传有关党禁的材料多出自朱子后学之手,其中关于朱学所受打压的记载不免存在有意无意地夸张与渲染。There were two kinds of books banned by court decrees during the Prohibition of Court Factions in the Period of Qingyuan(Qingyuan Dangjin):one were books used for imperial examination such as Yongjia writings, and the other were analects of Neo-Confucianism’s distributary.The ban on books dealt a blow to the school of Zhu Xi, but it also inadvertently helped the school eliminate other schools of different thoughts.Thus, the school of Zhuxi was both the victim and the beneficiary of the ban.The argument that The Six Classics,The Analects of Confucius,The Works of Mencius,The Doctrine of the Mean,and The Great Learning were all banned is not true.It was rumored that Zhu Xi’s works were destroyed in Nankang, but in fact this action had not been implemented.There is no evidence that Zhu Xi’s works had been destroyed during the Prohibition of Court Factions in the Period of Qingyuan.As a matter of fact, Zhu Xi still engaged in publishing activities during the prohibition of court factions.The extant historical materials on the prohibition of court factions were mainly recorded by successors of the school of Zhu Xi, and the record on the suppression of the school inevitably contained intentional or unintentional exaggerations and rendering.

关 键 词：庆元党禁 禁书 朱熹 朱学 

分 类 号：K245[历史地理—历史学]