检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘桂斌 LIU Gui-bin(Guangzhou Design Institute Group Co.Ltd.,Guangzhou 510000,China)
出 处:《工程建设与设计》2023年第1期26-29,共4页Construction & Design for Engineering
摘 要:结合计算实例,对梁板式楼盖在几种主流计算模式下的经济性展开分析讨论,并得出在消防车荷载下,顶板采用塑性算法的板配筋优势较大;板厚较厚(≥300mm)、消防车占比较小时,梁板协同算法较传统算法优势较为明显;单向单次梁方案在消防车荷载占比较小时,指标有一定优势等结论。Combined with the calculation examples, this paper analyzes and discusses the economy of beam slab floor under several mainstream calculation modes, and draws the following conclusions, as under the load of fire truck, the plate reinforcement with plastic algorithm is more advantageous;when the plate thickness is thicker(≥300mm) and the proportion of fire engines is small, the beam-board collaborative algorithm has obvious advantages over the traditional algorithm;When the load ratio of the fire truck is small, the index of one-way single beam scheme has certain advantages, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249