检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯伟 FENG Wei(School of Literature,Liaoning University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110036)
出 处:《绍兴文理学院学报》2023年第1期39-45,共7页Journal of Shaoxing University
摘 要:清末民初,狭邪小说研究主要附丽于中国传统小说评点范式。鲁迅在此基础上首次为狭邪小说树立现代小说学的学科规范,也囿于鲜明的批评观念与“题材”本位,将其置于文学史的边缘地位。此后小说史家大都沿着鲁迅的“声音”不断延展却少有反思,讨论渐趋稳定,结论也逐渐刻板。通过回顾学术史可以发现,关于狭邪小说文学价值与经典化的问题,还有继续审视的空间。At the end of the Qing dynasty,research on courtesan novels were mainly grounded on the traditional Chinese novel critique paradigm.On this basis,Lu Xun constructed the discipline norms of modern fiction for courtesan novels for the first time,butplaced courtesan novels on the margin of literary history,for he was limited by the distinct concept of criticism and subject standard.Afterwards,most novelists continued to follow Lu Xun’s opinion with rare reflection on it.The discussions have therefore become stable,and the conclusions rigid.On the basis of reviewing the academic history,it can be found that there is still room for further examination on the literary value and classicization of courtesan novels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.89.207