检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁富华[1] Yuan Fuhua
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院经济研究所
出 处:《学术前沿》2022年第24期33-46,共14页Frontiers
摘 要:社会理论中,现代化模式是一个具有严格定义并且得到系统论述的重要议题。二战后同时产生了两类现代化理论,以均衡社会为核心的福利资本主义植根于发达国家现代化实践,以工业化为核心的发展主义植根于欠发达国家现代化实践。但是,在理论和实践上,发展主义的现代化探索,多以发达资本主义历史经验为参照。现代化的中国经验和理论创造,给发展主义和均衡社会理论赋予了全新内容。作为模式多样性的一种独特方案,中国式现代化既具有演化共性,也具有不同于资本主义模式的鲜明特色。In social theory, the modernization pattern is an important issue that has been strictly defined and systematically discussed. After World War II, two types of modernization theories emerged simultaneously: welfare capitalism with social balance at its core, which is rooted in the modernization practices of developed countries, and developmentalism with industrialization at its core, which is rooted in the modernization practices of less developed countries. However, in terms of theory and practice, exploration of developmental modernization is mostly based on the historical experience of developed capitalism as a reference. The Chinese experience and theoretical innovation of modernization have given a new dimension to developmentalism and social balance theory.As a unique alternative to the diversity of models, Chinese path to modernization has both evolutionary commonalities and distinctive features that are different from the capitalist model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117