破坏生产经营罪“其他方法”的解释边界  

The Interpretation Boundary of “Other Methods” of the Crime of Destroying Production and Management

作　　者：吴允锋[1] 吴祈泫 WU Yun-Feng;WU Qi-Xuan(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《陕西行政学院学报》2023年第1期98-102,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance

摘　　要：破坏生产经营罪的保护法益是生产经营所带来的经济利益。在对本罪进行解释时要紧扣“经济利益”这一核心,从对象特征、行为特征、结果特征三个角度把握破坏生产经营罪的兜底条款。“其他方法”不仅涵盖对生产设备和经营资料的物理有形破坏,还包括对与生产经营必备要素的非物理破坏行为。为防止本罪规制范畴的过分扩张,应当通过审查行为是否对生产经营产生了直接、确定、可支配的破坏作用,将仅干扰生产经营秩序而未造成收益减损的破坏行为排除出本罪的评价范畴。The protection interests of the crime of destroying production and operation are the economic benefits brought by production and operation. In the interpretation of this crime, we should closely focus on the core of “economic benefits”, and grasp the general provisions of the crime of destroying production and operation from the three perspectives of object characteristics, behavior characteristics and result characteristics. “Other methods” not only cover physical and tangible damage to the production equipment and operation materials, but also non-physical damage to the essential elements of the production and operation. In order to prevent the excessive expansion of the regulation category of this crime, it is necessary to examine whether the behavior has a direct, definite and disposable destructive effect on the production and operation, and the destructive behavior that only interferes with the production and operation order without causing profit loss should be eliminated from the evaluation category of this crime.

关 键 词：破坏生产经营罪 网络犯罪 其他方法 兜底条款 

分 类 号：D924.33[政治法律—刑法学]