检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王影航 李金惠[2] 李炳超 Wang Yinghang;Li Jinhui;Li Bingchao(School of Law,South China Normal University Guangzhou 510006,China;Guangdong Techno-Economy Research&Development Center,Guangzhou 510070,China;Guangdong Association of Science of Science and S&T Management Research,Guangzhou 510033,China)
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学法学院,广东广州510006 [2]广东省技术经济研究发展中心,广东广州510070 [3]广东省科学学与科技管理研究会,广东广州510033
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2023年第4期97-105,共9页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(19BFX058);广东省软科学重大研究项目(2018B070713006);广东省软科学重点研究项目(2019B070714003)。
摘 要:中国公立高校院所职务科技成果权属改革进入赋权科研人员的改革深水区。赋权改革关系到公共财产合理处置与国家知识产权安全建设,必须在法治框架内施行。只有以落实单位权属法定与依法赋权原则为形式标准、以落实合比例赋权原则为实质标准推进改革,才能以法治手段规避改革过程中政府与市场的双重失灵。当前中国职务科技成果赋权改革面临试点方案违背上位法、赋权决策不合比例等法治难题。鉴于此,有关部门应进一步梳理完善职务科技成果单位所有与依法赋权的顶层设计,从目的适当性、手段必要性与结果均衡性等实质法治标准出发修正现有赋权改革措施,重点完善公立科研单位赋权科研人员的国资管理宽容规范、权利共有规则体系以及公益保障机制。In recent years,in order to encourage relevant institutions and researchers to actively participate in the transformation of related achievements,China has implemented a series of reform measures on the ownership of job-based scientific and technological achievements from the central to local levels.The relevant reforms can be divided into two parts.The first part is the reform to grant research institutions the right to use,dispose and benefit of scientific and technological achievements.The second is the reform of giving scientific researchers the ownership or long-term use right of job-based scientific and technological achievements,referred to as"empowerment reform".At present,the empowerment reform of scientific and technological achievements has entered a diversified phase.Some colleges and universities or local governments have issued some pilot reform measures,such as the compulsory mixed-ownership of job-based scientific and technological achievements.These measures lack the necessary theoretical demonstration and adjustment mechanism,and are easy to fall into the illegal and unreasonable predicaments.This phenomenon is closely related to the insufficient legalization of relevant reforms.This paper aims to explore the legal connotation and standards of the empowerment reform of job-based scientific and technological achievements from the perspective of formal and substantive rule of law,and discuss how to legally and reasonably dispose the ownership of job-based scientific and technological achievements with the attribute of state-owned assets in China and ensure that relevant subjects can reasonably and efficiently exercise the rights of achievements.The paper holds that in public scientific research institutions,the empowerment of the ownership of job-based scientific and technological achievements and the allocation of relevant rights and interests are related to the rational disposal of public property and the security construction of national intellectual property rights,and they must be implemented
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.56.30