检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李茜 秦春香[2] 彭惠婷 胡思卿 何思涵 何燕娟[5] LI Xi;QIN Chunxiang;PENG Huiting;HU Siqing;HE Sihan;HE Yanjuan(Jishou University School of Medicine,Jishou 416000,China;Department of Health Management,The Third XiangYa Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410000,China;Department of Gynaecology,Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Changsha 410000,China;XiangYa School of Nursing,Central South University,Changsha 410000,China;Department of Obstetrics,Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Changsha 410000,China)
机构地区:[1]吉首大学医学院,吉首416000 [2]中南大学湘雅三医院健康管理中心,长沙410000 [3]湖南省妇幼保健院妇科,长沙410000 [4]中南大学湘雅医学院护理学院,长沙410000 [5]湖南省长沙市妇幼保健院产科,长沙410000
出 处:《当代护士(上旬刊)》2022年第12期1-6,共6页Modern Nurse
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(72074225);湖南省重点研发计划(2020SK2089);湖南省卫生健康委科研计划项目(202114031150);长沙市自然科学基金(kq2014017)。
摘 要:目的对个体水平引产病耻感量表进行汉化,并检验其信度和效度。方法遵循美国矫形外科医师学会循证医学委员会推荐的量表跨文化调试指南对个体水平引产病耻感量表进行汉化,经文化调试后形成中文版个体水平引产病耻感量表。2020年7月—12月,使用该量表对469例胎儿畸形引产女性进行问卷调查并评价其信效度。结果中文版个体水平引产病耻感量表与原量表结构完全一致,探索性因子分析结果显示:共提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率78.667%;验证性因子分析结果显示:卡方自由度比值为1.794,渐进残差均方和平方根为0.058,规范拟合指数为0.915,递增拟合指数为0.961,塔克-刘易斯指数为0.954,比较拟合指数为0.960。量表各条目水平内容效度指数为0.833~1.000,全体一致量表水平内容效度指数为0.900,平均量表水平内容效度指数为0.983。总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.942,分半信度为0.841,重测信度为0.960。结论中文版个体水平引产病耻感量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国引产女性病耻感水平的评估工具。Objective To introduce the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale to China,and test its reliability and validity.Methods Following the cross-cultural adjustment guidelines for scales recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence Based Medicine Committee,we translate and form the Chinese version of the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale.The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated from July to December 2020 in 469 women with a history of an abortion after diagnosis of fetal anomaly.Results The Chinese version of the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale was completely consistent with the original scale.The exploratory factor analysis results show that a total of four common factors have been extracted,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 78.667%.The confirmatory factor analysis results show the chi-square degree of freedom ratio(χ^(2)/df)was 1.794,root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)was 0.058,normed fit index(NFI)was 0.915,incremental fit index(IFI)was 0.961,Tucker-Lewis Index(TLI)was 0.954 and the comparative fit index(CFI)was 0.960.The item-level content validity index(I-CVI)of each item ranged from 0.833 to 1.000.The scale-level content validity index/universal agreement(S-CVI/UA)was 0.900,and the scale-level content validity index/average(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.983.The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.942,the split-half reliability was 0.841,and the test-retest reliability was 0.960.Conclusion The Chinese version of the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a tool for assessing the level of stigma in women who have had an abortion in China.
关 键 词:引产 个体水平引产病耻感量表 信度 效度 病耻感
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229