检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶子 刘海涛[1] Ye Zi;Liu Hai-tao(School of International Studies,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出 处:《外语学刊》2023年第1期19-26,共8页Foreign Language Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“现代汉语口语省略现象计量研究”(20CYY030)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:配价在语言学中表示某个词与其他词结合的潜在能力。2000年左右,在北大学者的组织下,我国曾兴起过一波针对配价理论的讨论热潮。然而,最近的一项对配价理论进行过详尽综述的文献——刘海涛(2009)——的发表时间已是十余年前,而目前鲜有对近十年配价理论国内外发展的最新综述。因此,本文尝试结合数据库检索与文献梳理的方法来总结该领域的前沿进展。通过文献数据库检索,我们发现:继德国学者之后,国内学者逐渐在国际配价研究领域扮演着越来越重要的角色;“配价”在英语文献中出现明显的术语移指的趋势,而英语世界对原先配价现象的研究大多不在这一术语下展开;关于配价的研究在国内外文献中都逐步由理论转向应用。此外,通过文献梳理,我们还发现:在德国学者的推动下,配价语法开始与型式语法、构式语法等原先英美语言学界用来分析配价现象的理论产生融合。作为词的吸引力的两个方面,配价与搭配研究也出现交汇的趋势。国内学者侧重对价数这一概念的拓展,并基于语料库做过大量定量研究。本文进一步提出配价研究中存在的问题,如异名同实、同名异实、汉语配价词典尚欠缺等,进而对配价研究的未来发展做出展望。Valency refers to the potential combining power of a word with respect to other words.Around 2000,there were intense discussions on valency theory under the organization of scholars from Peking University.Since then,however,the latest comprehensive review of this field,Liu(2009),was published more than 10 years ago,and there is no review about the advances in valency research in the past ten years.Through retrieving in the database,the present study find that:(1)Following German scho-lars,Chinese researchers are playing more and more important roles in this field.(2)The term“valency”in the English literature now often refers to some different though related phenomena,while the study of the valency phenomenon itself falls under other rubrics.(3)Valency research has shown an apparent applied turn at both home and abroad.Combing through the literature,we also find that:(4)As primarily advocated by German scholars,there are trends to combine valency grammar with Pattern Grammar in the UK and Construction Grammar in the US.(5)Studies on valency and on collocation,which both reflect the combining power of words,start to converge.(6)Chinese scholars have paid much attention to the extension of quantitative aspect of valency and have conducted much of corpus-based research.The present review also points out some problems in the existent literature.Finally,we put forward outlooks for future studies in the field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.144.240