对比分析微型种植体支抗、传统的正畸方法在口腔正畸治疗中的疗效  

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Micro-implant Anchorage and Traditional Orthodontic Methods in Orthodontic Treatment

作　　者：汪孔敏 杨艳 WANG Kongmin;YANG Yan(Department of Stomatology,Ningde People′s Hospital,Ningde,Fujian Province,352100 China;Department of Or-thodontics,Ningde City Hospital,Ningde,Fujian Province,352100 China)

机构地区：[1]福建省宁德人民医院口腔科,福建宁德352100 [2]宁德市医院口腔正畸科,福建宁德352100

出　　处：《中外医疗》2022年第29期63-66,共4页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的本研究针对口腔正畸治疗中采取微型种植体支抗与传统正畸方法的疗效进行对比。方法随机选取2020年4月—2021年10月福建省宁德人民医院接受口腔正畸治疗的50例患者,按照不同治疗方法分成两组,各25例。其中对照组应用传统正畸方法,观察组应用微型种植体支抗,比较两组临床疗效、牙龈情况、咀嚼功能、不良反应发生情况。结果观察组的实际疗效为92.0%明显优于对照组的68.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.500,P<0.05);治疗后,观察组牙龈菌斑指数、牙龈出血指数及牙龈指数均比对照组更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组咀嚼咬合力与咀嚼效率指标均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应为8.0%低于对照组的32.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.500,P<0.05)。结论与传统正畸方法相比,进行口腔正畸治疗采用微型种植体支抗治疗的作用效果更佳理想,可促进咀嚼功能与牙龈情况有效好转,提高临床疗效的同时,治疗安全性也明显更高。Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of micro-implant anchorage and traditional orthodon⁃tic methods in orthodontic treatment.Methods A total of 50 patients who received orthodontic treatment in Ningde People′s Hospital from April 2020 to October 2021 were randomly selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods,25 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional orthodontic method,while the observation group was treated with micro-implant anchorage.The clinical efficacy,gingival condi⁃tion,chewing function and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The actual efficacy of the observation group was 92.0%significantly better than 68.0%of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.500,P<0.05);after treatment,the gingival plaque index,gingival bleeding index and gingival index of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and the differences were statisti⁃cally significant(P<0.05);the bite force and masticatory efficiency of the observation group were better than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the adverse reactions in the observation group were 8.0% lower than 32.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ^(2)=4.500, P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional orthodontic methods, the effect of micro-implant anchorage in orthodontictreatment is better and ideal, and it can effectively improve masticatory function and gingival condition. While improv⁃ing the clinical efficacy, the treatment safety is also significantly higher.

关 键 词：口腔正畸 传统正畸方法 微型种植体支抗 牙龈情况 咀嚼功能 

分 类 号：R246.83[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]