检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡圣武[1] 杨旭锋 苗林光 HU Shengwu;YANG Xufeng;MIAO Linguang(School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering,Henan Polytechnic University,Henan Jiaozuo 454000,China)
机构地区:[1]河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院,河南焦作454000
出 处:《北京测绘》2023年第1期95-99,共5页Beijing Surveying and Mapping
基 金:国家自然科学基金委员会-河南省人才培养联合基金项目(U1304401)。
摘 要:为了提高水准网平差精度和促进对定权重要性的认识,本文对目前水准网定权的五类方法进行了比较和实例分析。得到了结论:(1)定权不正确造成水准网各高程点平差结果以及其精度带来影响;(2)不同的定权方法所产生的权不一样,从而平差结果也不一样。本研究结论对水准网平差具有一定的参考价值。In order to improve the adjustment accuracy of leveling network and promote the understanding of the importance of determination weight, five kinds of methods for determining weights of leveling network were compared and analyzed with examples at present. The conclusion were as follows:(1) the incorrect weighting would affect the adjustment result and precision of leveling network;(2) the weights produced by different weighting methods were different, therefore the adjustment results were different. The conclusion of this study had a certain reference value for leveling network adjustment.
分 类 号:P207[天文地球—测绘科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.215.114