检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林芳[1] 吴煌[1] 陈钦 佘佩吟[1] 谢昭雄[1] LIN Fang;WU Huang;CHEN Qin;SHE Peiyin;XIE Zhaoxiong(General Surgery Department,Chaozhou City Central Hospital,Chaozhou,Guangdong,521000)
机构地区:[1]广东省潮州市中心医院普外科,广东潮州521000
出 处:《智慧健康》2022年第36期188-192,共5页Smart Healthcare
摘 要:目的探讨快速护理干预与常规护理在胃肠道肿瘤患者围手术期中的临床效果差异。方法选取2018年1月-2021年6月在本院行手术治疗的60例胃肠道肿瘤患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组。观察组30例,在常规护理的基础上给予快速护理干预;对照组30例,给予常规护理。结果观察组患者的住院时间、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、恢复流质饮食时间、Ⅱ-Ⅳ级疼痛率、不良反应总发生率普遍低于对照组(P<0.05);0级、Ⅰ级疼痛率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论快速护理干预在胃肠道肿瘤围手术期的应用,可以更好、更快地改善患者肠胃功能,降低患者疼痛感,降低治疗风险,取得更好的临床效果,值得推广使用。Objective To explore difference of clinical effect between rapid nursing intervention and routine nursing care for patients with gastrointestinal tumor during perioperative period.Methods The paper chose 60 patients with gastrointestinal tumors with surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 as research objects,and divided them into two groups randomly.30 cases in observation group was treated with rapid nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing,control group(30 cases)with routine nursing.Results Length of stay,out of bed time,time of anal exhaust,time of resuming liquid diet,rate of grade Ⅱ~Ⅳ pain and total incidence of adverse reactions in observation group were generally lower than control group(P<0.05);pain rate of grade 0 and Ⅰ was higher than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Rapid nursing intervention can improve gastrointestinal function,reduce pain,treatment risks better and faster,and achieve better clinical results for gastrointestinal tumors patients in perioperative period,which is worthy of promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222