儿童肠套叠水灌肠与空气灌肠的临床疗效比较  

Clinical Comparisons of Hydrostatic Enema and Air Enema on Treatment of Indigitation

作　　者：蒲永斌 PU Yongbin(Mianyang Central Hospital in Sichuan Province,621000)

机构地区：[1]绵阳市中心医院,四川绵阳621000

出　　处：《航空航天医学杂志》2022年第12期1416-1418,共3页Journal of Aerospace medicine

摘　　要：目的 分析对肠套叠患儿实施X线监视下水压灌肠及B超监视下空气灌肠的疗效。方法 自2020年6月-2021年6月接受治疗的肠套叠患儿中选取150例作为样本对象,依据随机排列法将其分为参照组(75例,予以X线下空气灌肠)及研究组(75例,予以B超下水压灌肠)。比较临床疗效及复位成功、复发及穿孔率。结果 研究组复位、大便隐血及住院时长均较短,P<0.05;研究组复位成功率及复发率较高,失败率及穿孔例数较低,P<0.05。结论 予以该疾病患儿水压灌肠及空气灌肠疗效对比,前者在复位时间、大便隐血持续时间、住院时间及复位成功率方面均具有明显优势,可促进患儿肠道功能恢复。Objective To discuss the clinical effects of B ultrasound-guidedhydrostatic enema and X ray-guided air enema on treatment of indigitation.Methods 150 indigitation children treated from June 2020 to June 2021 in our hospital were chosen as research subjects.According to random permutation method,children were divided into reference group(n=75,X ray-guided air enema) and study group(n=75,B ultrasound-guidedhydrostatic enema).Clinical effects,reduction,recurrence and perforation rates were compared.Results The reduction,stool occult blood and hospitalization time in the study group were shorter than reference group(P<0.05);the reduction and recurrence rates in the study group were higher than reference group;the failure rates and perforation cases in the study group were lower than reference group(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with air enema,the hydrostatic enema can decrease the reduction,stool occult blood and hospitalization time,increase the reduction rates and promote the children’s intestinal function recovery.

关 键 词：肠套叠 水压灌肠 空气灌肠 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R725.7[医药卫生—儿科]