基于意图和情感的南海学术论文引用特征研究  

Citation Characteristics of Scholarly Articles on South China Sea Based on Intentions and Sentiments

作　　者：齐小英 李昕尉 杨海平[1] Qi Xiaoying;Li Xinwei;Yang Haiping(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学信息管理学院,南京210023

出　　处：《数据分析与知识发现》2022年第12期53-69,共17页Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(项目编号:19BTQ053)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：【目的】分析南海学术论文的引用意图和引用情感,揭示学者的引用行为与学术思想涌现过程。【方法】建立引文分类体系,采用基于特征的支持向量机实现引文自动分类,基于知识图谱构建引文分类图谱,从总体分布、国家差异、引用主题三个方面分析南海学术论文的引用特征。【结果】引用意图和引用情感自动分类的F1宏平均值分别为0.75和0.72。中国学者倾向从历史视角维护南海主权,引用的意图主要作为“使用”和“背景”引用,引用的情感主要作为“中性”引用。【局限】语料数据规模较小,数据源的全面性有待加强。【结论】中国学者从历史视角维护南海主权的同时,也要加强从法理视角论证南海争议主题。[Objective]This paper analyzes the citation intentions and sentiments of academic papers on the South China Sea issue,aiming to reveal their citation behaviors and the emerging research ideas.[Methods]First,we used the feature-based SVM algorithm to automatically classify citations.Then,we built a citation classification knowledge map.Finally,we analyzed the papers’citation characteristics from their overall distribution,national differences,and topics.[Results]The F1 macro average of the automatic classification model reached 0.75 and 0.72 on citation intentions and sentiments.Chinese scholars tend to defend China’s sovereignty over the South China Sea from a historical perspective.Their leading citating intentions are“technical basis”or“backgrounds”,while their citation sentiment is generally“neutral”.[Limitations]The corpus data size and comprehensiveness need to be expanded.[Conclusions]Chinese scholars should strengthen their arguments of the South China Sea issue from the legal perspectives.

关 键 词：引用意图 引用情感 引文分类 引文分类图谱 南海 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学] TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]