检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季美君 Ji Meijun(Institute of Procuratorial Theory of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China)
机构地区:[1]Institute of Procuratorial Theory of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China
出 处:《China Legal Science》2023年第1期59-81,共23页中国法学(英文版)
摘 要:批捕权是世界各国刑事司法制度中普遍设立的一项权力。虽然多数国家由中立的法官来行使,但由于各国在历史传统、文化背景和司法制度等方面存在诸多差异,批捕权究竟由哪个部门来具体行使,则大不相同。从设立批捕权的目的及其本质作用来看,在中国,由检察机关来行使批捕权具有合理性。对于批捕权在运行过程中出现的不同程度问题,笔者认为并不是批捕权本身造成的。若想从根本上解决这些问题,应该将批捕与羁押在程序设置上一分为二,同时完善相应的配套措施,如贯彻落实“少捕慎诉慎押”刑事司法政策等,从而在打击犯罪与保障人权之间保持恰当的平衡,并充分发挥律师在司法实践中的重要作用。The power to approve arrest is a common power of the criminal justice system for all countries in the world,but which department to exercise it is reasonable?With a comparative study,we may find that due to the influences of the traditional culture and judicial custom in each country,it is exercised by diff erent departments in diff erent countries though it is done by neutral judges in most countries.However,from the purpose and the essential role of setting up the procedure of approving arrest,it is reasonable and legitimate for the procuratorial organ to exercise such power in China.But such allocation of power has been questioned by some scholars.In the author’s opinion,the fundamental way to solve these problems is to establish separate procedures for approving arrest and detention with several supporting measures,such as carrying out the criminal policy of‘less arrest,cautious prosecution and cautious detention’,maintaining the balance between combating crime and protecting human rights in idea and paying attention to the role of lawyers in practice.
关 键 词:刑事司法制度 批捕权 检察机关 刑事司法政策 程序设置 打击犯罪 羁押 司法实践
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.224.139