我国相对贫困标准研究——基于2018年CFPS数据库的测算  

The Study of China’s Relative Poverty Standards——A Calculation Based On 2018 CFPS Database

作　　者：周慧 ZHOU Hui(School of Business,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学商学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《经济研究导刊》2023年第2期4-8,共5页Economic Research Guide

摘　　要：立足我国区域发展不平衡不充分的基本国情,利用2018年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据库,基于收入中位数比例法,将样本分城乡、东中西、南北不同区域,探讨未来我国相对贫困标准的设定。研究发现,在全样本中,相对贫困集中于农村、西部和北方地区,其中城乡收入差距最大。划分样本后,相对贫困规模变小,贫困家庭分布更加合理,且东部和南方样本的相对贫困率较高。因此,建议我国今后一段时期内,基于人均可支配收入中位数的40%分城乡设定相对贫困标准,将总的相对贫困人口维持在我国总人口的15%—20%,并引入“贫困差距”等指标衡量贫困深度和贫困强度。Based on the basic national conditions of unbalanced and inadequate regional development in China, using the 2018 China Family Tracking Survey(CFPS) database and based on the median income ratio method, the sample is divided into urban and rural areas, east, west,north and south regions to explore the future setting of China’s relative poverty standards. The results show that in the whole sample, relative poverty is concentrated in rural, western and northern areas, with the largest income gap between urban and rural areas. After dividing the samples, the scale of relative poverty becomes smaller, the distribution of poor families is more reasonable, and the relative poverty rate of the eastern and southern samples is higher. Therefore, it is suggested that China should set a relative poverty standard based on 40% of the median per capita disposable income in urban and rural areas, maintain the total relative poverty population at 15% to 20% of the total population of China, and introduce indicators such as“poverty gap”to measure the depth and intensity of poverty.

关 键 词：相对贫困 贫困标准 地区差距 

分 类 号：F34[经济管理—产业经济]