检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周明洁[1,2] 李府桂 穆蔚琦 范为桥 张建新[1,2] 张妙清[4] ZHOU Mingjie;LI Fugui;MU Weiqi;FAN Weiqiao;ZHANG Jianxin;ZHANG Miaoqing(CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;Department of psychology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Department of psychology,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234;The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049 [3]上海师范大学心理系,上海200234 [4]香港中文大学,中国香港999077
出 处:《心理学报》2023年第3期390-405,共16页Acta Psychologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71774156)资助。
摘 要:为进一步挖掘中国人人际关系性人格特质的内涵,研究1采用“个体中心”的潜在剖面分析方法对1911名CPAI-2中国人的常模样本在人际关系性上的表现进行整体揭示。同时,为比较中西方人际关系性的不同,研究2探讨了非华人群体人际关系性的潜在剖面结构。研究3进一步在2580名大学生群体中验证中国人人际关系性上的外圆内方的潜在剖面结构,并探讨人际关系性的亚型以及哪种亚型的人在现代社会更具适应性。中国人群体的研究结果均呈现四分类模型,但这一分类模型并没有在西方样本中复现出来,并且研究3发现中国人群体中外圆内方的亚群体最具适应性。研究结合中国传统文化中的“君子人格”进行相关讨论,为当代中国人辩证统一的“外圆内方”的文化特异性的行为模式提供历史阐释及其当代生活适应性的证据。What is Chinese personality?This question has long attracted the interest of researchers.Joint factor analyses of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory(CPAI),which was generated using a combined emic-etic approach,and the NEO-FFI,which measures western-derived Big Five personality factors,produced six factors.These correspond to the five factors from the Big Five Model plus an Interpersonal Relatedness factor(IR).These six factors constitute the“Big Six”personality structure that describes and explains Chinese personality or behavior.IR is a culturally specific personality dimension that is closely related to traditional Chinese culture.The existence of IR has been confirmed by a large number of studies,but its connotations need to be further explored and refined.This paper discussed the subtypes of the Chinese IR personality trait from a quantitative perspective and further explored which subtype of IR was more adaptive.The study adopted a“person-centered approach”to reveal the overall nature of IR in Chinese people.In Study 1,1911 participants of the CPAI-2 normative sample were analyzed with latent profile analysis(LPA)in terms of six dimensions of IR–Ren Qing(Relationship Orientation),Harmony,Interpersonal Sensitivity,Discipline,Thrift vs.Extravagance,and Traditionalism vs.Modernity–to explore the potential subtypes of IR.In Study 2,200 white people were investigated to explore the latent profile structure of Interpersonal Relatedness in non-Chinese people.In Study 3,2580 juniors from a comprehensive university were investigated to verify the potential structure of IR obtained in Study 1.The LPA method with outcome variables(BCH method)was used to investigate the social adaptability of different subtypes of college students in the potential structure of IR in terms of academic performance,knowledge sharing behavior,and mental health.The results of Study 1 showed that the fourfold classification model of IR had the best fitting index.The fourfold classification model was specifically compose
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C91[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13