平台反垄断的中国抉择:强化反垄断法抑或引入行业规制?  

How Should China Make a Choice in the Regulation of Platform Monopoly:Strengthening Anti-Monopoly or Introducing Sector-Specific Regulation?

作　　者：侯利阳[1] Hou Liyang

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2023年第1期32-48,共17页Journal of Comparative Law

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“平台经济领域的反垄断与规制研究”(项目号:22AFX018)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：自中央在平台经济领域提出“强化反垄断和防止资本无序扩张”以来,我国的执法部门与立法部门一直以强化反垄断法的路径予以回应。但欧盟2022年10月12日颁布的《数字市场法》为平台反垄断提供了行业规制的新路径。此刻我国面临着是否要在平台经济领域引入行业规制的重大抉择。反垄断法擅长处理策略性市场失灵,行业规制适宜解决结构性市场失灵。我国平台经济的发展现状表明该领域缺乏稳定的结构性市场失灵,平台多以策略性市场进入障碍来促成垄断。鉴此,近期不宜在平台经济领域中立即引入行业规制,但可继续强化反垄断法来实现平台经济的健康持续发展。In answering to the call of the central government to strengthen anti-monopoly so as to prevent disorderly expansion of capital,China’s administrative agencies and legislative bodies have been trying to tighten the enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law.However,China is now faced with a difficult question whether or not to introduce sector-specific regulation,when EU presents an alternative path for regulating platform monopoly after the adoption of the Digital Market Act of the European Union on July 18,2022.The Anti-Monopoly Law is good at handling strategic market failure,whereas sector-specific regulation can better solve structural market failure which is in fact still rare in China.The platforms in China still resort to strategic entry deterrence to achieve monopoly power.Therefore,right now in China it is not the right time to introduce sector-specific regulation,and it is better to continue strengthening The Anti-Monopoly Law for the healthy and sustainable development of platform economy.

关 键 词：强化反垄断 反垄断法 行业规制 市场失灵 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学] D922.294[政治法律—国际法学]