英国高校科研评估制度改革与启示  

Reform and Enlightenment of the Research Assessment System in UK Universities

作　　者：杜钰娇 张宝歌 DU Yujiao;ZHANG Baoge(School of Education,Ningbo University,Ningbo,Zhengjiang 315211)

机构地区：[1]宁波大学教师教育学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《上海教育评估研究》2023年第1期67-72,共6页Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation

基　　金：浙江省“151人才工程”第一层次资助项目“学校质量发展的多样化评价理论、指标及政策保障研究”。

摘　　要：1986年英国首次开展科研绩效导向的评估活动以来,经历了科研选择性评估(RSE)、科研水平评估(RAE)以及科研卓越框架(REF)三个阶段。现行的科研卓越框架基于前几轮评估结果与经验,强调延用第三方评估机构、合并学科评估单元、调整评估指标权重、改进科研评估方法等推进高校科技创新。通过深入剖析英国REF2021,指出我国高校科研评估应积极引入第三方评估机构,构建跨学科研究评估机制,探索科研影响力评估体系,完善量化评估方式。In 1986,UK first conducted research-and performance-oriented assessment activities,experiencing three stages of“Research Selectivity Exercise”(RSE),“Research Assessment Exercise”(RAE)and“Research Excellence Framework”(REF).The current“Research Excellence Framework”,based on the evaluation results and experience of previous rounds,emphasizes the continuous use of third-party evaluation institutions,merging discipline evaluation units,adjusting the weight of evaluation indicators,improving the evaluation methods of scientific research so as to promote scientific and technological innovation in universities.Through the thorough analysis of the REF2021 in UK,the Chinese universities should actively introduce the third-party evaluation institutions,construct the interdisciplinary research evaluation mechanism,explore the evaluation of scientific research influence system,and improve the quantitative evaluation method.

关 键 词：科研制度 科研卓越框架 科研评估 

分 类 号：G649.1[文化科学—高等教育学]