环境政策调整损害补偿的缺位、错位与归位  

The Absence, Dislocation and Return of Environmental Policy Adjustment Damage Compensation

作　　者：连佑敏 LIAN You-min(Wuhan University,Research Institute of Environmental Law,Wuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学环境法研究所,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《华北电力大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期73-81,共9页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：无论是基于产业结构转型的化工企业退出,还是以禁食野生动物为目的的人工繁育退出,其本质均为行政管理中的环境政策调整。由此而生的损害补偿尚未纳入我国的行政补偿法律体系,而仅散见于各政策性文件。规范缺位造成司法对环境政策调整损害补偿性质的认定不一,行政征收补偿、撤回行政许可补偿和社会保障制度中的补偿均不能准确涵盖这一补偿类型。事实上,环境政策调整损害补偿对于夯实环境治理主体间交往理性的基础和整合社会多元价值有着不可替代的功能,有独立存在的必要性,应作为环境行政程序之内容纳入环境法典。Whether it is the withdrawal of chemical companies based on the transformation of industrial structure or the withdrawal of artificial breeding for the purpose of fasting wild animals, the essence is the adjustment of environmental policies in administrative management. The resulting damage compensation has not yet been incorporated into China’s administrative compensation legal system, but only scattered in various policy documents. The absence of regulations has caused different judgments on the nature of compensation for damages caused by adjustments to environmental policies. Administrative expropriation compensation, compensation for withdrawal of administrative licenses, and compensation in the social security system cannot accurately cover this type of compensation. In fact, environmental policy adjustment damage compensation has an irreplaceable function to consolidate the rational basis for communication between environmental governance subjects and integrate social diverse values. It is necessary to exist independently and should be included in the environmental code as the content of environmental administrative procedures.

关 键 词：环境政策调整 损害补偿 行政征收 产业转型 人工繁育退出 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] F205[政治法律—法学]