检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏加福 张凤婷 王丹[1] 胡洪源 李婷婷 SU Jiafu;ZHANG Fengting;WANG Dan;HU Hongyuan;LI Tingting(National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China;School of Economics and Management,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065,China;College of International,Krirk University,Bangkok 10220,Thailand)
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学智能制造服务国际科技合作基地,重庆400067 [2]重庆邮电大学经济管理学院,重庆400065 [3]格乐大学国际学院,泰国曼谷10220
出 处:《计算机集成制造系统》2023年第2期650-664,共15页Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般资助项目(青年基金项目)(19YJC630141);重庆市自然科学基金面上资助项目(CSTB2022NSCQMSX0478)。
摘 要:为了探究知识协同对知识供应链伙伴选择的影响,帮助核心成员选择合适的知识供应链合作伙伴,基于知识外溢和知识创新,分别研究了二者对核心成员和协同成员之间预期收益分配的影响,采用宗系解分配预期总收益,进而得到知识供应链的伙伴选择策略。研究表明,在不考虑协同成员知识创新的情况下,核心成员将优先选择具有知识存量优势的协同成员组成知识供应链;核心成员只有在知识外溢成本较低时,才会通过知识外溢增加知识供应链的整体预期收益。在考虑协同成员知识创新的情况下,具有知识存量优势的协同成员进入知识供应链仍具有较大优势;对于具有知识存量劣势的协同成员,只有当其知识创新收益均高于具有知识存量优势的协同成员且达到一定阈值时,才会与核心成员组成知识供应链。研究有助于揭示知识供应链伙伴选择的内在机理,诠释知识供应链的知识协同理念,为知识供应链的知识管理实践提供理论参考和决策支持。To explore the influence of knowledge collaboration on the selection of knowledge supply chain partners,and to help core members select suitable knowledge supply chain partners,the effects of both on the distribution of expected benefits among core and collaborative members were investigated respectively based on knowledge spillover and knowledge innovation,and the clique solution was used to allocate the total expected benefits,which leaded to the partner selection strategy of the knowledge supply chain.The results showed that without considering the knowledge innovation of collaborative members,the core member would give priority to selecting collaborative members with knowledge stock advantage to form a knowledge supply chain;only when the cost of knowledge spillover was low,the core member would increase the overall expected income of the knowledge supply chain through knowledge spillover.In the case of considering the knowledge innovation of collaborating members,the collaborating member with knowledge stock advantage still had a greater advantage in entering the knowledge supply chain.For the two collaborating members with knowledge stock disadvantage,they would form the knowledge supply chain with the core member only when their knowledge innovation benefits were higher than those of the collaborating member with knowledge stock advantage and reach a certain threshold.This study could help to reveal the internal mechanism of partner selection in knowledge supply chain,interpret the knowledge collaboration concept of knowledge supply chain,and provide theoretical reference and decision support for the knowledge management practice of knowledge supply chain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.243.24