锂电池检测实验室的风险分析与应对  

Risks analysis and responses of lithium battery testing laboratories

作　　者：杨旭[1] 戴妙妙[1] 徐微[1] 刘春学[1] YANG Xu;DAI Miao-miao;XU Wei;LIU Chun-xue(Shanghai Institute of Quality Inspection and Technical Research,Shanghai 201114,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市质量监督检验技术研究院,上海201114

出　　处：《电池》2023年第1期83-87,共5页Battery Bimonthly

摘　　要：分析探究锂电池实验室遇到的各类安全性和溯源性问题,对于实验室的水平提升和行业的健康发展至关重要。基于认可准则IEC 17025:2017《检测和校准实验室能力的通用要求》中的11种要素,如人员,设施和环境条件,设备,外部提供的产品和服务,要求、标书和合同评审,方法的选择、验证和确认,检测物品的处置,技术记录,不确定度评估,确保结果有效性以及结果报告等,搭建锂电池检测实验室遇到的25种典型失效模型。采用失效模型和效应分析(FMEA)的方法进行原因分析,制定控制措施,完成风险等级评价。建议实验室采用制定程序文件、加强培训、实施监督和加强比对等方式,不断提升风险意识和应对能力。Analysis and exploration of various safety and traceability problems encountered by lithium battery laboratories were crucial to the improvement of laboratory level and the healthy development of the industry.Based on the 11 main risk factors in the accreditation criteria of IEC 17025:2017 Accreditation Criteria for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories,such as personnel,facilities and environmental conditions,equipment,externally provided products and services,requirements,tenders and contract reviews,method selection,verification and confirmation,disposal of test items,technical records,uncertainty assessment,ensuring the validity of results and results reporting,25 typical failure models for lithium battery testing laboratory were built.Cause analysis were carried out by adopting the failure model and effect analysis(FMEA)method,control measures were formulated,risk assessments were completed.It was recommended that laboratories continuously improved risk awareness and response capabilities by formulating procedural documents,strengthening training,implementing supervision and strengthening comparisons.

关 键 词：失效模型和效应分析(FMEA) 电池检测 风险分析 风险应对 锂电池 

分 类 号：TM911.1[电气工程—电力电子与电力传动] TM912.9