检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭娜 张骏 冯立 GUO Na;ZHANG Jun;FENG Li(School of Finance,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China)
出 处:《财经论丛》2023年第2期35-44,共10页Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71903142);国家社会科学基金项目(21AJY015)。
摘 要:金融科技将金融与科技相联结,为银行业转型升级提供新机遇,而股权结构作为银行治理的基础,将对银行创新活动安排与金融科技发展产生重要作用。本文利用2010—2019年我国112家商业银行的数据,探讨股权集中度、股权制衡、股权性质等股权结构特征对银行金融科技发展的影响。研究结果表明,股权集中度对银行金融科技发展具有正向促进作用,较为集中的股权安排有利于股东充分发挥自身股权优势,集中资源开展创新活动,从而推动银行金融科技发展;非控股股东股权占比的合理增加能够发挥股权制衡作用,提升创新效率,从而有利于银行金融科技发展;尽管国有属性的控股股东更有利于金融科技的发展,但国有持股比例过高反而不利于银行金融科技发展。本文研究为商业银行完善公司治理机制、推进数字化转型发展提供了理论依据和经验支持。In recent years, Chinese commercial banks have gradually transformed their traditional conservative business model, continuing to increase their investment in FinTech. In the process of banks’ digital transformation, the equity structure, as the core of corporate governance, determines different corporate organizational structures and fundamentally affects the deployment of corporate innovation resources and innovation strategy decisions, which is of great significance for banks’ FinTech development. Clarifying the impact of the equity structure on banks’ FinTech development is crucial for commercial banks to plan and adapt their organizational structure to match their digital strategic transformation. This paper innovatively introduces the perspective of commercial banks’ equity structure to explore the impact of the equity structure on banks’ FinTech development in the followingthree aspects: equity concentration, equity checks and balances, and equity nature, using 112 commercial banks in China from 2010 to 2019 as a research sample. The results of the empirical analysis are as follows: First, equity concentration is to a certain extent beneficial to the development of FinTech in commercial banks. A more concentrated shareholding makes the bank’s investment in technology concentrated and permanent, improves the decision-making efficiency and thus accelerates the process of financial technicalization. Second, the checks and balances mechanism among shareholders is conducive to improving the level of the financial technology development of commercial banks, and reducing the short-sightedness caused by the phenomenon of“one share is too big”, which is conducive to the development of FinTech in banks. Third, though state-owned shareholders are more conducive to the development of FinTech, an excessively high proportionof the state-owned shareholders is detrimental to FinTech development. State-owned shareholders operate traditional financial institutions, focus more on maintaining the stability of
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222