比较法视角下我国股东失权制度的修正  

Amendment of the Deprivation of Shareholders in China from the Perspective of Comparative Law

作　　者：唐波[1] 王炜炫 TANG Bo;WANG Wei-xuan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,China,200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2022年第6期48-55,共8页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

摘　　要：《公司法司法解释(三)》第17条同时借鉴了德国的股东除名和股东失权,可以理解为中国法语境下的股东除名。在此基础上,《公司法(修订草案)》第46条正式引入股东失权。域外法上,股东失权的立法目的是为了维持公司资本充足,失权股东丧失股东资格乃股权没收下的附带属性。而相较之下,我国的股东失权在适用范围、行权程序以及法律效果上均有进一步解释和完善的空间。同时如若新《公司法》最终正式引入股东失权,则前者股东除名的催告程序可以予以删除,以区分我国的股东除名和股东失权,使二者在公司法框架下发挥各自的规范功能。Although Article 17 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Certain issues Concerning the Application of the"Company Law of the People's Republic of China"(Ⅲ)draws on both the shareholder expulsion and deprivation of shares in Germany,it can still be interpreted as the shareholder expulsion system in the context of Chinese law.On this basis,Article 46 of the Company Law(Revised Draft)formally introduced the system of deprivation.In extraterritorial law,the legislative purpose of deprivation is to maintain the company's capital adequacy,and the loss of shareholders'eligibility is a subsidiary attribute of the confiscation of shares.In contrast,China's deprivation system still needs further explanation and improvement in the scope of application,exercise procedures and legal effects.At the same time,if the Company Law finally and formally introduces the system of deprivation,the reminder procedure of the former shareholder's expulsion system can be deleted to distinguish the system of shareholder's expulsion and the deprivation system in China,so that they can play their respective roles in the context of the Company Law.

关 键 词：股东除名 股东失权 人合性 资合性 抽逃出资 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]