组织帮助型垄断协议规制的现实困境和因应策略  

The dilemma and coping strategy of regulation of organizational-assisted monopoly agreements

作　　者：朱紫薇 ZHU Zi-wei(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073 China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2023年第1期75-82,共8页Journal of Xinyu University

摘　　要：新修订的《中华人民共和国反垄断法》第十九条新增对组织帮助型垄断协议的规定,打破了传统垄断协议二分法模式,弥补了传统垄断协议规制路径中存在的疏漏。但作为新兴事物,学界对组织帮助型垄断协议尚未搭建完整全面的理论分析框架,亦未形成类型化规制路径,仍面临共谋认定的证明困境与违法分析工具的适用难题。鉴于此,探析组织帮助型垄断协议的共谋认定标准与违法分析工具实属必要。即在共谋认定上,选择客观行为的事实推定进路,从经营者的信息交流行为与平行行为中进行推定;在违法认定上,以反竞争效果为实质性要件,综合评估排除限制竞争效果。Article 19 of the newly revised Anti-monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China adds new provisions on organizational-assisted monopoly agreements,breaking the dichotomy model of traditional monopoly agreements and making up for the omissions in the regulation path of traditional monopoly agreements.However,as a new thing,the academic circle has not yet built a complete and comprehensive theoretical analysis framework for the organizational-assisted monopoly agreement,nor has it formed a typed regulatory path,and still faces the difficulties of proving collusion and the application of illegal analysis tools.In view of this,it is necessary to explore the regulation criteria of collusion and illegal analysis tools of the organization-assisted monopoly agreement.In other words,in the determination of collusion,we select the factual presumption approach of objective behavior,and infer from the information exchange behavior and parallel behavior of operators;in the determination of illegal,take the anti-competitive effect as the substantive element,and comprehensively evaluate the effect of eliminating and restricting competition.

关 键 词：组织帮助型垄断协议 《中华人民共和国反垄断法》 二分法模式 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]