机构地区:[1]兰州大学第一医院普通外科甘肃省肝胆胰外科研究所,兰州730013 [2]天津市南开医院微创外科中心,天津300100 [3]陆军军医大学第一附属医院肝胆外科,重庆400038 [4]西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科,西安710061 [5]广州医科大学附属第二医院肝胆外科,广州510260 [6]中南大学湘雅二医院微创外科中心,长沙410012 [7]宁夏医科大学总医院肝胆外科,银川750003 [8]太原钢铁(集团)有限公司总医院普通外科,太原030008 [9]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科,上海200092 [10]吉林大学第一医院肝胆胰外科,长春130061 [11]新疆医科大学第一附属医院肝胆外科,乌鲁木齐830011 [12]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院胃肠外科,武汉430022 [13]河北医科大学第二医院胆胰内镜外科,石家庄050000 [14]山东省立第三医院肝胆外科,济南250031 [15]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肝胆胰外科,杭州310009 [16]兰州大学第二医院普通外科,兰州730030 [17]树兰(杭州)医院
出 处:《中华消化外科杂志》2023年第1期113-121,共9页Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基 金:甘肃自然科学基金(20JR10RA676);甘肃省省级引导科技创新发展专项资金竞争性项目(甘财科[2018]32号);兰州市城关区科技计划项目(2020JSCX0043)。
摘 要:目的:探讨胆总管结石合并壶腹周围憩室(PAD)临床特征及行经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)发生困难插管的影响因素。方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2015年7月至2017年12月我国兰州大学第一医院等15家医学中心收治的1920例行ERCP治疗胆总管结石患者的临床资料;男915例,女1005例;年龄为(63±16)岁。1920例患者中,228例合并PAD,1692例未合并PAD。观察指标:(1)胆总管结石患者临床特征。(2)胆总管结石患者行ERCP术中及术后情况。(3)胆总管结石患者行ERCP发生困难插管的影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)或M(Q1,Q3)表示,组间比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。单因素及多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。结果:(1)胆总管结石患者临床特征。合并PAD和未合并PAD胆总管结石患者年龄,体质量指数,合并症(慢性阻塞性肺疾病),胆总管直径,胆总管直径分类(<8 mm、8~12 mm、>12 mm),结石长径,结石数目(单发、多发)分别为(69±12)岁,(23.3±3.0)kg/m^(2),16例,(14±4)mm,11、95、122例,(12±4)mm,89、139例和(62±16)岁,(23.8±2.8)kg/m^(2),67例,(12±4)mm,159、892、641例,(10±4)mm,817、875例,两者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-7.55、2.45,χ^(2)=4.54,t=-4.92,Z=4.66,t=-7.31,χ2=6.90,P<0.05)。(2)胆总管结石患者行ERCP术中及术后情况。合并PAD和未合并PAD胆总管结石患者内镜下球囊扩张长径,术中出血,出血处理(黏膜下注射、止血夹、喷雾止血、电凝止血、其他),内镜下塑料支架置入,内镜下鼻胆管引流,机械碎石,取净结石,困难插管,延迟插管,>5次插管尝试,插管时间,X射线暴露时间,手术时间分别为10.0(8.5~12.0)mm,56例,6、5、43、1、1例,52例,177例,67例,201例,74例,38例,74例,(7.4±3.1)min,(6±3)min,(46±19)min和9.0Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of choledocholithiasis com-bined with periampullary diverticulum and influencing factor for difficult cannulation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP).Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinical data of 1920 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis in 15 medical centers,including the First Hospital of Lanzhou University,et al,from July 2015 to December 2017 were collected.There were 915 males and 1005 females,aged(63±16)years.Of 1920 patients,there were 228 cases with periampullary diverticulum and 1692 cases without periampullary diverticulum.Observation indicators:(1)clinical characteristics of patients with choledocholithiasis;(2)intraoperative and postoperative situations of patients undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis;(3)influencing factor analysis for difficult cannulation in patients undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and comparison between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range)or M(Q1,Q3),and com-parison between groups was conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages,and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.The Logistic regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.Results(1)Clinical characteristics of patients with choledocholithiasis.Age,body mass index,cases with complications as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,diameter of common bile duct,cases with diameter of common bile duct as<8 mm,8‒12 mm,>12 mm,diameter of stone,cases with number of stones as single and multiple were(69±12)years,(23.3±3.0)kg/m^(2),16,(14±4)mm,11,95,122,(12±4)mm,89,139 in patients with choledocholithiasis combined with periampullary diverticulum,versus(62±16)years,(23.8±2.8)kg/m^(2),67,(12±4)mm,159,892,6
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...