检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺小石 He Xiaoshi
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学马克思主义学院,上海201620
出 处:《探索与争鸣》2022年第12期197-204,214,共9页Exploration and Free Views
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“生物识别信息传播风险及法律规制研究”(21BXW039)。
摘 要:过度收集和滥用个人网络行为信息会损害信息主体的权利和自由,阻碍数字经济发展。当下,对个人网络行为信息的法律定性悬而未决,导致相应的保护规则与秩序构建徘徊不前。传统信息主体赋权保护路径无法妥善解决信息关系中的权力结构失衡问题,应将个人网络行为信息纳入个人信息范畴,对其进行人格利益和财产利益的双重保护。新技术条件下,信息主体与信息控制者之间存在事实上的信息信义关系,个人信息保护路径应从赋权模式转向行为规制模式,充分运用权利分割思想,借鉴信托制度,积极探索以信义义务为核心的数据信托机制,兼顾信息主体利益和数字经济发展要求。The excessive collection and misuse of personal online behavior information negatively affects the rights and freedom of data subjects and has become a major obstacle to the development of the digital economy. Due to the ambiguous legal attributes of personal online behavior information, the corresponding protection rules and order building remain dismal. Traditional path of data subject empowerment cannot properly solve the problem of power imbalance in unequal information relationships. Personal online behavior information should be included in the category of personal information and protected with both personality interest and property interest. Under the new technological conditions, there is a de facto information fiduciary relationship between data subjects and data controllers. The protection of personal information should shift from the empowerment mode to the behavior regulation mode, fully apply the idea of division of rights, draw on the institutional norms of trust law, actively explore the data trust mechanism with fiduciary duty as the core, and come out with a protection path that balances the interests of data subject and the development of digital economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38