荣誉权:一项旨在维护自尊的权利  

The Right to Honor:A Right to Maintain Self-esteem

作　　者：刘练军 Liu Lianjun

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期45-52,153,共9页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：东南大学人权研究院项目阶段性成果;江苏高校社科项目“人格权重大疑难问题研究”(2020SJZDA091)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：多数学者都将荣誉理解为一种来自单位组织的正式评价,把荣誉权界定为民事主体对其获得的荣誉及其利益所享有的保持和支配的身份权。然而,荣誉概念所表达的价值内涵是人的自尊需要,而不是来自他人与社会的尊重。是故,荣誉权的本质不在于保持外在的荣誉称号,它应当是一项旨在维护人之自尊的权利。在荣誉权纠纷案中判断侵权与否的标准在于:一方的自尊是否因对方的不当行为而受到侵害;一旦侵害事实能够被证明,那受害方应当获得一定的精神损害赔偿。但对获得的荣誉称号没有记载或记载错误的,并不构成荣誉权侵害,因为该行为所针对的是外在的荣誉称号,而非当事人的内在自尊。Most scholars regard honor as a kind of formal evaluation from units and organizations,and define the right of honor as the right of status of civil subject to maintain and control the honor and its interests.However,the value connotation expressed by the concept of honor is the need of man’s self-esteem,not from the respect given by others and society.Therefore,the essence of the right to honor is not to maintain the external honorary title,it should be a right to protect people’s self-esteem.In the case of right to honor dispute,the standard to judge whether the infringement is or not lies in whether one party’s self-esteem is infringed due to the other party’s improper behavior;once the infringement facts can be proved,the injured party should obtain certain spiritual damage compensation.However,if there is no record or wrong record of the honorary title,it does not constitute the infringement of the right of honor,because the behavior is aimed at the external honorary title,rather than the self-esteem of the subject of honor right.

关 键 词：荣誉 自尊 荣誉权 荣誉称号 精神赔偿 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]