检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋甲楠 Song Jianan
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期53-57,153,共6页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:检察权的性质与地位问题事关检察制度的根本和发展方向,在学术界和实务界长期存在争论,对此可从法教义学和功能主义理论视角进行检视。检察权是一种具有独立的宪法地位和法律监督功能的国家权力;检察权地位具有独立性,其内涵多元,包括“四大权能”,即“诉讼权能”“诉讼监督权能”“审查权能”“侦查调查权能”。正确把握新时代检察权的意蕴,有助于推动“四大检察”充分发展,提升检察权的法律监督质效。The questions on the categories and the position of the procuratorial power relate to the very foundation and the direction of procuratorial systems and their developments.Yet for so long has the very questions not been properly answered either by theoretical circles or practical communities.It is safe to reconsider the very questions based on‘Rechtsdogmatik’and functionalism,and realizes that the procuratorial power is the state power,with constitutional,independent,and supervisional features;and the procuratorial power’s position is too independent,with polyphyletic“four functions”:prosecutional function,prosecution-supervision function,judicial-investigational functions and inquisitional function.Grasping the modern procuratorial power’s core and constructions rightfully,can contribute to the improvements of“Four Procuratorial Authorities”,as well as the effectiveness of the procuratorial power’s supervisional functions.
关 键 词:人民检察院 检察权 宪法定位 法律监督 “四大权能”
分 类 号:DF214[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7