隐私确权的个人维度与社会维度  

Personal Dimension and Social Dimension of Privacy Confirmation

作　　者：李延舜 Li Yanshun

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期64-69,154,共7页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“互联网企业数据合规义务研究”(21BFX094)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：信息隐私领域的“自决”与“控制”理论影响隐私权研究,并体现在法律文本中。然而,个人信息与主体之关联性及隐私之重要性绝不意味着隐私权的主观化。通过对隐私的个人维度和社会维度的阐述,我们可以发现隐私权的研究进路是个人主义的,研究起点和终点都落脚于个人,但关于隐私标准、公民隐私期待的合理性判断以及隐私权与其他权利的冲突与调和却都体现社群主义的观点。说到底,隐私权是一个彰显“程度”判断的问题,它并非“全有”或“全无”。个人隐私要上升到隐私权保护,需要与社会隐私观相契合,同时在多元价值间作出精心安排,才能预期自由、开放的社会。At present,the“self-determination”and“control”theories seem to dominate privacy research in the field of informational privacy,and reflected in legal documents.However,the importance of privacy to individuals does not imply the subjectivity of privacy in any way.Through the elaboration of the individual and social dimensions of privacy,we can find that the approach to privacy is individualistic,and the starting point and the end point of the research are all individual,but the privacy standards,the judgment of citizens’privacy expectations,and the conflicts and the reconcile between the right of privacy and the other fundamental rights,all reflect the views of communitarianism.After all,privacy is a matter of“degree”judgment,It is not“all”or“all nothing”.Privacy wants to be the object of privacy law,need to get social recognition,and make exquisite arrangements among multiple values to anticipate a free and open society.

关 键 词：隐私权 个人主义 社会隐私观 隐私合理期待 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]